Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1097/QMH.0000000000000113 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1097/QMH.0000000000000113 C5054974!5054974!27749718     free     free     free Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=27749718&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Qual+Manag+Health+Care 2016 ; 25 (4): 213-8 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=27749718|t=2016. A Systematic Approach to Clinical Peer Review in a Critical Access Hospital |pdf=|usr=}}{{27749718}} gab.com Text A Systematic Approach to Clinical Peer Review in a Critical Access Hospital JO: Qual Manag Health Care http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27749718 #FOAvip Purpose:: Clinical provider peer review (CPPR) is a process for evaluating a patient's experience in encounters of care. It is part of ongoing professional practice evaluation and focused professional practice evaluation?important contributors to provider credentialing and privileging. Critical access hospitals are hindered in CPPR by having a limited number of providers, shortages of staff resources, and relationships among staff members that make unbiased review difficult. Small departments within larger institutions may face similar challenges. Methods:: A CPPR process created at Mayo Clinic Health System is described. It involved a case review questionnaire built on the Institute of Medicine ?Six Aims for Changing the Health Care System,? a standardized intervention algorithm and tracking tool. Outcomes:: During 2007 through 2014, a total of 994 cases were reviewed; 31% led to provider dialog and education or intervention. Findings were applied to core measure processes with success rate going from 87% to 97%. Changes were adopted in end-of-life care, contributing to a 50% reduction in all-cause mortality rate. Conclusions:: Providing peer review tools to a critical access hospital can keep peer review within a group with knowledge of the individual provider's practice and can make process improvement the everyday work of those involved. Twit Text FOAVip A Systematic Approach to Clinical Peer Review in a Critical Access Hospital ????Qual Manag Health Care http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27749718 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27749718 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|27749718}}</ref> A Systematic Approach to Clinical Peer Review in a Critical Access Hospital #MMPMID27749718 Deyo-Svendsen ME; Phillips MR; Albright JK; Schilling KA; Palmer KB Qual Manag Health Care 2016[Oct]; 25 (4): 213-8 PMID27749718show ga Purpose:: Clinical provider peer review (CPPR) is a process for evaluating a patient's experience in encounters of care. It is part of ongoing professional practice evaluation and focused professional practice evaluation?important contributors to provider credentialing and privileging. Critical access hospitals are hindered in CPPR by having a limited number of providers, shortages of staff resources, and relationships among staff members that make unbiased review difficult. Small departments within larger institutions may face similar challenges. Methods:: A CPPR process created at Mayo Clinic Health System is described. It involved a case review questionnaire built on the Institute of Medicine ?Six Aims for Changing the Health Care System,? a standardized intervention algorithm and tracking tool. Outcomes:: During 2007 through 2014, a total of 994 cases were reviewed; 31% led to provider dialog and education or intervention. Findings were applied to core measure processes with success rate going from 87% to 97%. Changes were adopted in end-of-life care, contributing to a 50% reduction in all-cause mortality rate. Conclusions:: Providing peer review tools to a critical access hospital can keep peer review within a group with knowledge of the individual provider's practice and can make process improvement the everyday work of those involved. äA Systematic Approach to Clinical Peer Review in a Critical Access Hos(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing