Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1080/21645698.2015.1134406 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1080/21645698.2015.1134406 C5033199!5033199!26930116     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       GM+Crops+Food 2015 ; 6 (4): 233-42 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=26930116|t=2015. A new window of opportunity to reject process-based biotechnology regulation |pdf=|usr=}}{{26930116}} gab.com Text A new window of opportunity to reject process-based biotechnology regulation JO: GM Crops Food http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26930116 #FOAvip ABSTRACT. The question of whether biotechnology regulation should be based on the process or the product has long been debated, with different jurisdictions adopting different approaches. The European Union has adopted a process-based approach, Canada has adopted a product-based approach, and the United States has implemented a hybrid system. With the recent proliferation of new methods of genetic modification, such as gene editing, process-based regulatory systems, which are premised on a binary system of transgenic and conventional approaches, will become increasingly obsolete and unsustainable. To avoid unreasonable, unfair and arbitrary results, nations that have adopted process-based approaches will need to migrate to a product-based approach that considers the novelty and risks of the individual trait, rather than the process by which that trait was produced. This commentary suggests some approaches for the design of such a product-based approach. Twit Text FOAVip A new window of opportunity to reject process-based biotechnology regulation ????GM Crops Food http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26930116 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26930116 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|26930116}}</ref> A new window of opportunity to reject process-based biotechnology regulation #MMPMID26930116 Marchant GE; Stevens YA GM Crops Food 2015[]; 6 (4): 233-42 PMID26930116show ga ABSTRACT. The question of whether biotechnology regulation should be based on the process or the product has long been debated, with different jurisdictions adopting different approaches. The European Union has adopted a process-based approach, Canada has adopted a product-based approach, and the United States has implemented a hybrid system. With the recent proliferation of new methods of genetic modification, such as gene editing, process-based regulatory systems, which are premised on a binary system of transgenic and conventional approaches, will become increasingly obsolete and unsustainable. To avoid unreasonable, unfair and arbitrary results, nations that have adopted process-based approaches will need to migrate to a product-based approach that considers the novelty and risks of the individual trait, rather than the process by which that trait was produced. This commentary suggests some approaches for the design of such a product-based approach. äA new window of opportunity to reject process-based biotechnology regu(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing