Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1186/s13104-016-2249-2

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1186/s13104-016-2249-2
suck pdf from google scholar
C5027116!5027116!27639851
unlimited free pdf from europmc27639851    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

suck abstract from ncbi


Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534

Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
pmid27639851      BMC+Res+Notes 2016 ; 9 (ä): ä
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • A portable mnemonic to facilitate checking for cognitive errors #MMPMID27639851
  • Chew KS; van Merriënboer J; Durning SJ
  • BMC Res Notes 2016[]; 9 (ä): ä PMID27639851show ga
  • Background: Although a clinician may have the intention of carrying out strategies to reduce cognitive errors, this intention may not be realized especially under heavy workload situations or following a period of interruptions. Implementing strategies to reduce cognitive errors in clinical setting may be facilitated by a portable mnemonic in the form of a checklist. Methods: A 2-stage approach using both qualitative and quantitative methods was used in the development and evaluation of a mnemonic checklist. In the development stage, a focus-driven literature search and a face-to-face discussion with a content expert in cognitive errors were carried out. Categories of cognitive errors addressed and represented in the checklist were identified. In the judgment stage, the face and content validity of the categories of cognitive errors represented in the checklist were determined. This was accomplished through coding responses of a panel of experts in cognitive errors. Results: From the development stage, a preliminary version of the checklist in the form of four questions represented by four specific letters was developed. The letter ?T? in the TWED checklist stands for ?Threat? (i.e., ?is there any life or limb threat that I need to rule out in this patient??), ?W? for ?Wrong/What else? (i.e., ?What if I am wrong? What else could it be??), ?E? for ?evidences? (i.e., ?Do I have sufficient evidences to support or exclude this diagnosis??), and ?D? for ?dispositional factors? (i.e., ?is there any dispositional factor that influence my decision?). In the judgment stage, the content validity of most categories of cognitive errors addressed in the checklist was rated highly in terms of their relevance and representativeness (with modified kappa values ranging from 0.65 to 1.0). Based on the coding of responses from seven experts, this checklist was shown to be sufficiently comprehensive to activate the implementation intention of checking cognitive errors. Conclusion: The TWED checklist is a portable mnemonic checklist that can be used to activate implementation intentions for checking cognitive errors in clinical settings. While its mnemonic structure eases recall, its brevity makes it portable for quick application in every clinical case until it becomes habitual in daily clinical practice. Electronic supplementary material: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13104-016-2249-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
  • ä


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box