Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1098/rspa.2015.0883 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1098/rspa.2015.0883 C5014099!5014099!27616914     free     free     free       Proc+Math+Phys+Eng+Sci 2016 ; 472 (2192): ä Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=27616914|t=2016. Constructor theory of probability |pdf=|usr=}}{{27616914}} gab.com Text Constructor theory of probability JO: Proc Math Phys Eng Sci http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27616914 #FOAvip Unitary quantum theory, having no Born Rule, is non-probabilistic. Hence the notorious problem of reconciling it with the unpredictability and appearance of stochasticity in quantum measurements. Generalizing and improving upon the so-called ?decision-theoretic approach?, I shall recast that problem in the recently proposed constructor theory of information?where quantum theory is represented as one of a class of superinformation theories, which are local, non-probabilistic theories conforming to certain constructor-theoretic conditions. I prove that the unpredictability of measurement outcomes (to which constructor theory gives an exact meaning) necessarily arises in superinformation theories. Then I explain how the appearance of stochasticity in (finitely many) repeated measurements can arise under superinformation theories. And I establish sufficient conditions for a superinformation theory to inform decisions (made under it) as if it were probabilistic, via a Deutsch?Wallace-type argument?thus defining a class of decision-supporting superinformation theories. This broadens the domain of applicability of that argument to cover constructor-theory compliant theories. In addition, in this version some of the argument's assumptions, previously construed as merely decision-theoretic, follow from physical properties expressed by constructor-theoretic principles. Twit Text FOAVip Constructor theory of probability ????Proc Math Phys Eng Sci http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27616914 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27616914 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|27616914}}</ref> Constructor theory of probability #MMPMID27616914 Marletto C Proc Math Phys Eng Sci 2016[Aug]; 472 (2192): ä PMID27616914show ga Unitary quantum theory, having no Born Rule, is non-probabilistic. Hence the notorious problem of reconciling it with the unpredictability and appearance of stochasticity in quantum measurements. Generalizing and improving upon the so-called ?decision-theoretic approach?, I shall recast that problem in the recently proposed constructor theory of information?where quantum theory is represented as one of a class of superinformation theories, which are local, non-probabilistic theories conforming to certain constructor-theoretic conditions. I prove that the unpredictability of measurement outcomes (to which constructor theory gives an exact meaning) necessarily arises in superinformation theories. Then I explain how the appearance of stochasticity in (finitely many) repeated measurements can arise under superinformation theories. And I establish sufficient conditions for a superinformation theory to inform decisions (made under it) as if it were probabilistic, via a Deutsch?Wallace-type argument?thus defining a class of decision-supporting superinformation theories. This broadens the domain of applicability of that argument to cover constructor-theory compliant theories. In addition, in this version some of the argument's assumptions, previously construed as merely decision-theoretic, follow from physical properties expressed by constructor-theoretic principles. äConstructor theory of probability (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing