Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1371/journal.pbio.1002542 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002542 C5012555!5012555!27599158     free     free     free       PLoS+Biol 2016 ; 14 (9): ä Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=27599158|t=2016. Citation Metrics: A Primer on How (Not) to Normalize |pdf=|usr=}}{{27599158}} gab.com Text Citation Metrics: A Primer on How (Not) to Normalize JO: PLoS Biol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27599158 #FOAvip Citation metrics are increasingly used to appraise published research. One challenge is whether and how to normalize these metrics to account for differences across scientific fields, age (year of publication), type of document, database coverage, and other factors. We discuss the pros and cons for normalizations using different approaches. Additional challenges emerge when citation metrics need to be combined across multiple papers to appraise the corpus of scientists, institutions, journals, or countries, as well as when trying to attribute credit in multiauthored papers. Different citation metrics may offer complementary insights, but one should carefully consider the assumptions that underlie their calculation. Twit Text FOAVip Citation Metrics: A Primer on How (Not) to Normalize ????PLoS Biol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27599158 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27599158 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|27599158}}</ref> Citation Metrics: A Primer on How (Not) to Normalize #MMPMID27599158 Ioannidis JPA; Boyack K; Wouters PF PLoS Biol 2016[Sep]; 14 (9): ä PMID27599158show ga Citation metrics are increasingly used to appraise published research. One challenge is whether and how to normalize these metrics to account for differences across scientific fields, age (year of publication), type of document, database coverage, and other factors. We discuss the pros and cons for normalizations using different approaches. Additional challenges emerge when citation metrics need to be combined across multiple papers to appraise the corpus of scientists, institutions, journals, or countries, as well as when trying to attribute credit in multiauthored papers. Different citation metrics may offer complementary insights, but one should carefully consider the assumptions that underlie their calculation. äCitation Metrics: A Primer on How (Not) to Normalize (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing