Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.4168/aair.2016.8.6.541 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.4168/aair.2016.8.6.541 C5011055!5011055!27582406     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Allergy+Asthma+Immunol+Res 2016 ; 8 (6): 541-4 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=27582406|t=2016. The Basophil Activation Test Is Safe and Useful for Confirming Drug-Induced Anaphylaxis |pdf=|usr=}}{{27582406}} gab.com Text The Basophil Activation Test Is Safe and Useful for Confirming Drug-Induced Anaphylaxis JO: Allergy Asthma Immunol Res http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27582406 #FOAvip The basophil activation test (BAT) has been suggested as a complementary method for diagnosing drug allergies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical utility of this test in patients with drug-induced anaphylaxis. In total, 19 patients, all of whom had a history of moderate to severe anaphylaxis, were enrolled. None of the causative drugs had available in vitro tests or reliable skin tests; these drugs included, among others, first and second-generation cephalosporins, H2 blockers, and muscle relaxants. The BAT yielded positive results in 57.9% of the cases, which was similar those results of skin prick and intradermal tests (42.1% and 57.9%, respectively). When basophils were double labelled with CD63 and CD203c, both of which are basophil activation markers, the positive rate was increased from 57.9% to 73.7%. Therefore, the results of this study confirm that the BAT is a quick, reliable, and safe diagnostic tool for patients with drug-induced anaphylaxis. Twit Text FOAVip The Basophil Activation Test Is Safe and Useful for Confirming Drug-Induced Anaphylaxis ????Allergy Asthma Immunol Res http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27582406 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27582406 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|27582406}}</ref> The Basophil Activation Test Is Safe and Useful for Confirming Drug-Induced Anaphylaxis #MMPMID27582406 Kim SY; Kim JH; Jang YS; Choi JH; Park S; Hwang YI; Jang SH; Jung KS Allergy Asthma Immunol Res 2016[Nov]; 8 (6): 541-4 PMID27582406show ga The basophil activation test (BAT) has been suggested as a complementary method for diagnosing drug allergies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical utility of this test in patients with drug-induced anaphylaxis. In total, 19 patients, all of whom had a history of moderate to severe anaphylaxis, were enrolled. None of the causative drugs had available in vitro tests or reliable skin tests; these drugs included, among others, first and second-generation cephalosporins, H2 blockers, and muscle relaxants. The BAT yielded positive results in 57.9% of the cases, which was similar those results of skin prick and intradermal tests (42.1% and 57.9%, respectively). When basophils were double labelled with CD63 and CD203c, both of which are basophil activation markers, the positive rate was increased from 57.9% to 73.7%. Therefore, the results of this study confirm that the BAT is a quick, reliable, and safe diagnostic tool for patients with drug-induced anaphylaxis. äThe Basophil Activation Test Is Safe and Useful for Confirming Drug-In(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing