Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1177/1941738116663922 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1177/1941738116663922 C5010138!5010138!27510507     free     free     free       Sports+Health 2016 ; 8 (5): 418-28 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=27510507|t=2016. Advanced Imaging in Osteoarthritis |pdf=|usr=}}{{27510507}} gab.com Text Advanced Imaging in Osteoarthritis JO: Sports Health http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27510507 #FOAvip Context:: Radiography is widely accepted as the gold standard for diagnosing osteoarthritis (OA), but it has limitations when assessing early stage OA and monitoring progression. While there are improvements in the treatment of OA, the challenge is early recognition. Evidence Acquisition:: MEDLINE and PubMed as well as professional orthopaedic and imaging websites were reviewed from 2006 to 2016. Study Design:: Clinical review. Level of Evidence:: Level 4. Results:: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can provide the most comprehensive assessment of joint injury and OA with the advantages of being noninvasive and multiplanar with excellent soft tissue contrast. However, MRI is expensive, time consuming, and not widely used for monitoring OA clinically. Computed tomography (CT) and CT arthrography (CTA) can also be used to evaluate OA, but these are also invasive and require radiation exposure. Ultrasound is particularly useful for evaluation of synovitis but not for progression of OA. Conclusion:: MRI, CT, and CTA are available for the diagnosis and monitoring of OA. Improvement in techniques and decrease in cost can allow some of these modalities to be effective methods of detecting early OA. Twit Text FOAVip Advanced Imaging in Osteoarthritis ????Sports Health http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27510507 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27510507 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|27510507}}</ref> Advanced Imaging in Osteoarthritis #MMPMID27510507 Li Q; Amano K; Link TM; Ma CB Sports Health 2016[Sep]; 8 (5): 418-28 PMID27510507show ga Context:: Radiography is widely accepted as the gold standard for diagnosing osteoarthritis (OA), but it has limitations when assessing early stage OA and monitoring progression. While there are improvements in the treatment of OA, the challenge is early recognition. Evidence Acquisition:: MEDLINE and PubMed as well as professional orthopaedic and imaging websites were reviewed from 2006 to 2016. Study Design:: Clinical review. Level of Evidence:: Level 4. Results:: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can provide the most comprehensive assessment of joint injury and OA with the advantages of being noninvasive and multiplanar with excellent soft tissue contrast. However, MRI is expensive, time consuming, and not widely used for monitoring OA clinically. Computed tomography (CT) and CT arthrography (CTA) can also be used to evaluate OA, but these are also invasive and require radiation exposure. Ultrasound is particularly useful for evaluation of synovitis but not for progression of OA. Conclusion:: MRI, CT, and CTA are available for the diagnosis and monitoring of OA. Improvement in techniques and decrease in cost can allow some of these modalities to be effective methods of detecting early OA. äAdvanced Imaging in Osteoarthritis (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing