Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1186/s12886-016-0321-2

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1186/s12886-016-0321-2
suck pdf from google scholar
C5007688!5007688!27580699
unlimited free pdf from europmc27580699    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

suck abstract from ncbi


Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534

Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534

Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
pmid27580699      BMC+Ophthalmol 2016 ; 16 (1): ä
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Chung?s swing technique: a new technique for small-incision lenticule extraction #MMPMID27580699
  • Kim BK; Mun SJ; Lee DG; Choi HT; Chung YT
  • BMC Ophthalmol 2016[]; 16 (1): ä PMID27580699show ga
  • Background: To introduce the Chung?s swing technique for small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). Methods: A total of 112 eyes of 56 patients were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups: 52 eyes of 26 patients were treated with SMILE using a traditional method (traditional group) and 60 eyes of 30 patients were treated with SMILE using the Chung?s swing technique (swing group). Results: At 1 month postoperatively, all eyes in both groups had an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 or better. The efficacy indices were 1.09?±?0.17 and 1.02?±?0.11 (p?=?0.492), and the safety indices were 1.12?±?0.14 and 1.09?±?0.15 (p?=?0.537), for the traditional and swing group, respectively. All eyes in both groups underwent successful lenticule extraction; all lenticules were intact and complete. The mean lenticule extraction times were 48.67?±?4.9 and 39.8?±?5.53 s, for the traditional and swing group, respectively (p?
  • ä


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box