Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1542/peds.2016-1278 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1542/peds.2016-1278 C5005028!5005028!27561728     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Pediatrics 2016 ; 138 (3): ä Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=27561728|t=2016. Prognostic Disclosures to Children: A Historical Perspective |pdf=|usr=}}{{27561728}} gab.com Text Prognostic Disclosures to Children: A Historical Perspective JO: Pediatrics http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27561728 #FOAvip Prognostic disclosure to children has perpetually challenged clinicians and parents. In this article, we review the historical literature on prognostic disclosure to children in the United States using cancer as an illness model. Before 1948, there was virtually no literature focused on prognostic disclosure to children. As articles began to be published in the 1950s and 1960s, many clinicians and researchers initially recommended a ?protective? approach to disclosure, where children were shielded from the harms of bad news. We identified 4 main arguments in the literature at this time supporting this ?protective? approach. By the late 1960s, however, a growing number of clinicians and researchers were recommending a more ?open? approach, where children were included in discussions of diagnosis, which at the time was often synonymous with a terminal prognosis. Four different arguments in the literature were used at this time supporting this ?open? approach. Then, by the late 1980s, the recommended approach to prognostic disclosure in pediatrics shifted largely from ?never tell? to ?always tell.? In recent years, however, there has been a growing appreciation for the complexity of prognostic disclosure in pediatrics. Current understanding of pediatric disclosure does not lead to simple ?black-and-white? recommendations for disclosure practices. As with most difficult questions, we are left to balance competing factors on a case-by-case basis. We highlight 4 categories of current considerations related to prognostic disclosure in pediatrics, and we offer several approaches to prognostic disclosure for clinicians who care for these young patients and their families. Twit Text FOAVip Prognostic Disclosures to Children: A Historical Perspective ????Pediatrics http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27561728 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27561728 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|27561728}}</ref> Prognostic Disclosures to Children: A Historical Perspective #MMPMID27561728 Sisk BA; Bluebond-Langner M; Wiener L; Mack J; Wolfe J Pediatrics 2016[Sep]; 138 (3): ä PMID27561728show ga Prognostic disclosure to children has perpetually challenged clinicians and parents. In this article, we review the historical literature on prognostic disclosure to children in the United States using cancer as an illness model. Before 1948, there was virtually no literature focused on prognostic disclosure to children. As articles began to be published in the 1950s and 1960s, many clinicians and researchers initially recommended a ?protective? approach to disclosure, where children were shielded from the harms of bad news. We identified 4 main arguments in the literature at this time supporting this ?protective? approach. By the late 1960s, however, a growing number of clinicians and researchers were recommending a more ?open? approach, where children were included in discussions of diagnosis, which at the time was often synonymous with a terminal prognosis. Four different arguments in the literature were used at this time supporting this ?open? approach. Then, by the late 1980s, the recommended approach to prognostic disclosure in pediatrics shifted largely from ?never tell? to ?always tell.? In recent years, however, there has been a growing appreciation for the complexity of prognostic disclosure in pediatrics. Current understanding of pediatric disclosure does not lead to simple ?black-and-white? recommendations for disclosure practices. As with most difficult questions, we are left to balance competing factors on a case-by-case basis. We highlight 4 categories of current considerations related to prognostic disclosure in pediatrics, and we offer several approaches to prognostic disclosure for clinicians who care for these young patients and their families. äPrognostic Disclosures to Children: A Historical Perspective (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing