Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1007/s10539-016-9531-5 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1007/s10539-016-9531-5 C5003906!5003906!27642204     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Biol+Philos 2016 ; 31 (5): 619-37 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=27642204|t=2016. The relativity of Darwinian populations and the ecology of endosymbiosis |pdf=|usr=}}{{27642204}} gab.com Text The relativity of Darwinian populations and the ecology of endosymbiosis JO: Biol Philos http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27642204 #FOAvip If there is a single discipline of science calling the basic concepts of biology into question, it is without doubt microbiology. Indeed, developments in microbiology have recently forced us to rethink such fundamental concepts as the organism, individual, and genome. In this paper I show how microorganisms are changing our understanding of natural aggregations and develop the concept of a Darwinian population to embrace these discoveries. I start by showing that it is hard to set the boundaries of a Darwinian population, and I suggest thinking of a Darwinian population as a relative property of a Darwinian individual. Then I argue, in contrast to the commonly held view, that Darwinian populations are multispecies units, and that in order to accept the multispecies account of Darwinian populations we have to separate fitness from natural selection. Finally, I show how all these ideas provide a theoretical framework leading to a more precise understanding of the ecology of endosymbiosis than is afforded by poetic metaphors such as ?slavery?. Twit Text FOAVip The relativity of Darwinian populations and the ecology of endosymbiosis ????Biol Philos http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27642204 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27642204 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|27642204}}</ref> The relativity of Darwinian populations and the ecology of endosymbiosis #MMPMID27642204 Stencel A Biol Philos 2016[]; 31 (5): 619-37 PMID27642204show ga If there is a single discipline of science calling the basic concepts of biology into question, it is without doubt microbiology. Indeed, developments in microbiology have recently forced us to rethink such fundamental concepts as the organism, individual, and genome. In this paper I show how microorganisms are changing our understanding of natural aggregations and develop the concept of a Darwinian population to embrace these discoveries. I start by showing that it is hard to set the boundaries of a Darwinian population, and I suggest thinking of a Darwinian population as a relative property of a Darwinian individual. Then I argue, in contrast to the commonly held view, that Darwinian populations are multispecies units, and that in order to accept the multispecies account of Darwinian populations we have to separate fitness from natural selection. Finally, I show how all these ideas provide a theoretical framework leading to a more precise understanding of the ecology of endosymbiosis than is afforded by poetic metaphors such as ?slavery?. äThe relativity of Darwinian populations and the ecology of endosymbios(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing