Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1007/s10195-016-0410-2 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1007/s10195-016-0410-2 C4999378!4999378!27312248     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 247.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 247.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 247.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 247.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 247.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 247.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 247.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       J+Orthop+Traumatol 2016 ; 17 (3): 223-9 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=27312248|t=2016. A comparative study of two percutaneous pinning techniques (lateral vs medial?lateral) for Gartland type III pediatric supracondylar fracture of the humerus |pdf=|usr=}}{{27312248}} gab.com Text A comparative study of two percutaneous pinning techniques (lateral vs medial lateral) for Gartland type III pediatric supracondylar fracture of the humerus JO: J Orthop Traumatol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27312248 #FOAvip Background: The management of displaced supracondylar fracture of the humerus with closed reduction and percutaneous pin fixation is the most widely accepted method of treatment, but controversy continues regarding the pin fixation techniques. A prospective randomized controlled study was undertaken to compare the stability, functional outcome and iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury between lateral pin fixation and medial?lateral pin fixation. Material and method: Sixty-two patients with Gartland type III supracondylar fracture of the humerus were randomized into two groups?lateral pin fixation (n = 31) and medial?lateral pin fixation (n = 31). Primary assessment was performed for major loss of reduction and iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury. Secondary assessment included clinical outcome, elbow range of motion, radiographic measurements, Flynn grade, and complications. Results: There were two (6.5 %) iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury cases in the medial?lateral entry group and two (6.5 %) cases with mild loss of reduction in the lateral entry group. No major loss of reduction was observed in either of the groups. There was no statistically significant difference in change of Baumann angle, metaphyseal?diaphyseal angle, Flynn grade, carrying angle, and the total elbow range of motion (P < 0.05) between the two groups. Conclusions: Lateral pin fixation offers similar functional and radiological outcome and almost equal mechanical stability compared with medial?lateral pinning without the risk of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury. Level of evidence [OCEBM 2011]: Level 2. Twit Text FOAVip A comparative study of two percutaneous pinning techniques (lateral vs medial lateral) for Gartland type III pediatric supracondylar fracture of the humerus ????J Orthop Traumatol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27312248 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27312248 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|27312248}}</ref> A comparative study of two percutaneous pinning techniques (lateral vs medial?lateral) for Gartland type III pediatric supracondylar fracture of the humerus #MMPMID27312248 Prashant K; Lakhotia D; Bhattacharyya TD; Mahanta AK; Ravoof A J Orthop Traumatol 2016[Sep]; 17 (3): 223-9 PMID27312248show ga Background: The management of displaced supracondylar fracture of the humerus with closed reduction and percutaneous pin fixation is the most widely accepted method of treatment, but controversy continues regarding the pin fixation techniques. A prospective randomized controlled study was undertaken to compare the stability, functional outcome and iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury between lateral pin fixation and medial?lateral pin fixation. Material and method: Sixty-two patients with Gartland type III supracondylar fracture of the humerus were randomized into two groups?lateral pin fixation (n = 31) and medial?lateral pin fixation (n = 31). Primary assessment was performed for major loss of reduction and iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury. Secondary assessment included clinical outcome, elbow range of motion, radiographic measurements, Flynn grade, and complications. Results: There were two (6.5 %) iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury cases in the medial?lateral entry group and two (6.5 %) cases with mild loss of reduction in the lateral entry group. No major loss of reduction was observed in either of the groups. There was no statistically significant difference in change of Baumann angle, metaphyseal?diaphyseal angle, Flynn grade, carrying angle, and the total elbow range of motion (P < 0.05) between the two groups. Conclusions: Lateral pin fixation offers similar functional and radiological outcome and almost equal mechanical stability compared with medial?lateral pinning without the risk of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury. Level of evidence [OCEBM 2011]: Level 2. äA comparative study of two percutaneous pinning techniques (lateral vs(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing