Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1177/0038038515590756 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1177/0038038515590756 C4887816!4887816!27330226     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Sociology 2016 ; 50 (3): 486-501 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=27330226|t=2016. Reputational Risk, Academic Freedom and Research Ethics Review |pdf=|usr=}}{{27330226}} gab.com Text Reputational Risk, Academic Freedom and Research Ethics Review JO: Sociology http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27330226 #FOAvip Drawing on scholarship around academic freedom and new public management, this article explores the way in which research ethics committees in UK universities (URECs) can come to exhibit behaviour ? common in their US equivalents ? that prioritises the reputational protection of their host institution over and above academic freedom and the protection of research subjects. Drawing on two case studies the article shows both how URECs can serve to restrict research that may be ?embarrassing? for a university and how, in high profile cases, university management come to use such committees as mechanisms for internal discipline. Twit Text FOAVip Reputational Risk, Academic Freedom and Research Ethics Review ????Sociology http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27330226 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27330226 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|27330226}}</ref> Reputational Risk, Academic Freedom and Research Ethics Review #MMPMID27330226 Hedgecoe A Sociology 2016[Jun]; 50 (3): 486-501 PMID27330226show ga Drawing on scholarship around academic freedom and new public management, this article explores the way in which research ethics committees in UK universities (URECs) can come to exhibit behaviour ? common in their US equivalents ? that prioritises the reputational protection of their host institution over and above academic freedom and the protection of research subjects. Drawing on two case studies the article shows both how URECs can serve to restrict research that may be ?embarrassing? for a university and how, in high profile cases, university management come to use such committees as mechanisms for internal discipline. äReputational Risk, Academic Freedom and Research Ethics Review (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing