Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1093/poq/nfv054 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1093/poq/nfv054 C4884820!4884820!27257305     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Public+Opin+Q 2016 ; 80 (1): 1-25 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=27257305|t=2016. Party Identification, Contact, Contexts, and Public Attitudes toward Illegal Immigration |pdf=|usr=}}{{27257305}} gab.com Text Party Identification, Contact, Contexts, and Public Attitudes toward Illegal Immigration JO: Public Opin Q http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27257305 #FOAvip Illegal immigration is a contentious issue on the American policy agenda. To understand the sources of public attitudes toward immigration, social scientists have focused attention on political factors such as party identification; they have also drawn on theories of intergroup contact to argue that contact with immigrants shapes immigration attitudes. Absent direct measures, contextual measures such as respondents? ethnic milieu or proximity to salient geographic features (such as borders) have been used as proxies of contact. Such a research strategy still leaves the question unanswered ? is it contact or context that really matters? Further, which context, and for whom? This article evaluates the effects of party identification, personal contact with undocumented immigrants, and contextual measures (county Hispanic population and proximity to the US?Mexico border) on American attitudes toward illegal immigration. It finds that contextual factors moderate the effects of political party identification on attitudes toward illegal immigration; personal contact has no effect. These findings challenge the assumption that contextual measures act as proxies for interpersonal contact. Twit Text FOAVip Party Identification, Contact, Contexts, and Public Attitudes toward Illegal Immigration ????Public Opin Q http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27257305 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27257305 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|27257305}}</ref> Party Identification, Contact, Contexts, and Public Attitudes toward Illegal Immigration #MMPMID27257305 Gravelle TB Public Opin Q 2016[Spr]; 80 (1): 1-25 PMID27257305show ga Illegal immigration is a contentious issue on the American policy agenda. To understand the sources of public attitudes toward immigration, social scientists have focused attention on political factors such as party identification; they have also drawn on theories of intergroup contact to argue that contact with immigrants shapes immigration attitudes. Absent direct measures, contextual measures such as respondents? ethnic milieu or proximity to salient geographic features (such as borders) have been used as proxies of contact. Such a research strategy still leaves the question unanswered ? is it contact or context that really matters? Further, which context, and for whom? This article evaluates the effects of party identification, personal contact with undocumented immigrants, and contextual measures (county Hispanic population and proximity to the US?Mexico border) on American attitudes toward illegal immigration. It finds that contextual factors moderate the effects of political party identification on attitudes toward illegal immigration; personal contact has no effect. These findings challenge the assumption that contextual measures act as proxies for interpersonal contact. äParty Identification, Contact, Contexts, and Public Attitudes toward I(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing