Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.4253/wjge.v8.i9.378 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.4253/wjge.v8.i9.378 C4861854!4861854!27170838     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       World+J+Gastrointest+Endosc 2016 ; 8 (9): 378-84 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=27170838|t=2016. Western view of the management of gastroesophageal foreign bodies |pdf=|usr=}}{{27170838}} gab.com Text Western view of the management of gastroesophageal foreign bodies JO: World J Gastrointest Endosc http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27170838 #FOAvip The best modality for foreign body removal has been the subject of much controversy over the years. We have read with great interest the recent article by Souza Aguiar Municipal Hospital, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, describing their experience with the management of esophageal foreign bodies in children. Non-endoscopic methods of removing foreign bodies (such as a Foley catheter guided or not by fluoroscopy) have been successfully used at this center. These methods could be an attractive option because of the following advantages: Shorter hospitalization time; easy to perform; no need for anesthesia; avoids esophagoscopy; and lower costs. However, the complications of these procedures can be severe and potentially fatal if not performed correctly, such as bronchoaspiration, perforation, and acute airway obstruction. In addition, it has some disadvantages, such as the inability to directly view the esophagus and the inability to always retrieve foreign bodies. Therefore, in Western countries clinical practice usually recommends endoscopic removal of foreign bodies under direct vision and with airway protection whenever possible. Twit Text FOAVip Western view of the management of gastroesophageal foreign bodies ????World J Gastrointest Endosc http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27170838 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27170838 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|27170838}}</ref> Western view of the management of gastroesophageal foreign bodies #MMPMID27170838 Burgos A; Rábago L; Triana P World J Gastrointest Endosc 2016[May]; 8 (9): 378-84 PMID27170838show ga The best modality for foreign body removal has been the subject of much controversy over the years. We have read with great interest the recent article by Souza Aguiar Municipal Hospital, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, describing their experience with the management of esophageal foreign bodies in children. Non-endoscopic methods of removing foreign bodies (such as a Foley catheter guided or not by fluoroscopy) have been successfully used at this center. These methods could be an attractive option because of the following advantages: Shorter hospitalization time; easy to perform; no need for anesthesia; avoids esophagoscopy; and lower costs. However, the complications of these procedures can be severe and potentially fatal if not performed correctly, such as bronchoaspiration, perforation, and acute airway obstruction. In addition, it has some disadvantages, such as the inability to directly view the esophagus and the inability to always retrieve foreign bodies. Therefore, in Western countries clinical practice usually recommends endoscopic removal of foreign bodies under direct vision and with airway protection whenever possible. äWestern view of the management of gastroesophageal foreign bodies (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing