Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.3346/jkms.2016.31.5.660

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.3346/jkms.2016.31.5.660
suck pdf from google scholar
C4835589!4835589!27134485
unlimited free pdf from europmc27134485    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid27134485      J+Korean+Med+Sci 2016 ; 31 (5): 660-73
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Specialist Bibliographic Databases #MMPMID27134485
  • Gasparyan AY; Yessirkepov M; Voronov AA; Trukhachev VI; Kostyukova EI; Gerasimov AN; Kitas GD
  • J Korean Med Sci 2016[May]; 31 (5): 660-73 PMID27134485show ga
  • Specialist bibliographic databases offer essential online tools for researchers and authors who work on specific subjects and perform comprehensive and systematic syntheses of evidence. This article presents examples of the established specialist databases, which may be of interest to those engaged in multidisciplinary science communication. Access to most specialist databases is through subscription schemes and membership in professional associations. Several aggregators of information and database vendors, such as EBSCOhost and ProQuest, facilitate advanced searches supported by specialist keyword thesauri. Searches of items through specialist databases are complementary to those through multidisciplinary research platforms, such as PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Familiarizing with the functional characteristics of biomedical and nonbiomedical bibliographic search tools is mandatory for researchers, authors, editors, and publishers. The database users are offered updates of the indexed journal lists, abstracts, author profiles, and links to other metadata. Editors and publishers may find particularly useful source selection criteria and apply for coverage of their peer-reviewed journals and grey literature sources. These criteria are aimed at accepting relevant sources with established editorial policies and quality controls.
  • ä


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box