Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1007/s11606-015-3582-1 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1007/s11606-015-3582-1 C4835363!4835363!26786877     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 229.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 229.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 229.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 229.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 229.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 263.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 263.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       J+Gen+Intern+Med 2016 ; 31 (5): 548-60 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=26786877|t=2016. Impact of Electronic Medical Record Use on the Patient?Doctor Relationship and Communication: A Systematic Review |pdf=|usr=}}{{26786877}} gab.com Text Impact of Electronic Medical Record Use on the Patient Doctor Relationship and Communication: A Systematic Review JO: J Gen Intern Med http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26786877 #FOAvip BACKGROUND: While Electronic Medical Record (EMR) use has increased dramatically, the EMR?s impact on the patient?doctor relationship remains unclear. This systematic literature review sought to understand the impact of EMR use on patient?doctor relationships and communication. METHODS: Parallel searches in Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, reference review of prior systematic reviews, meeting abstract reviews, and expert reviews from August 2013 to March 2015 were conducted. Medical Subject Heading terms related to EMR use were combined with keyword terms identifying face-to-face patient?doctor communication. English language observational or interventional studies (1995?2015) were included. Studies examining physician attitudes only were excluded. Structured data extraction compared study population, design, data collection method, and outcomes. RESULTS: Fifty-three of 7445 studies reviewed met inclusion criteria. Included studies used behavioral analysis (28) to objectively measure communication behaviors using video or direct observation and pre-post or cross-sectional surveys to examine patient perceptions (25). Objective studies reported EMR communication behaviors that were both potentially negative (i.e., interrupted speech, low rates of screen sharing) and positive (i.e., facilitating questions). Studies examining overall patient perceptions of satisfaction, communication or the patient?doctor relationship (n?=?22) reported no change with EMR use (16); a positive impact (5) or showed mixed results (1). Study quality was not assessable. Small sample sizes limited generalizability. Publication bias may limit findings. DISCUSSION: Despite objective evidence that EMR use may negatively impact patient?doctor communication, studies examining patient perceptions found no change in patient satisfaction or patient?doctor communication. Therefore, our findings should encourage providers to adopt the EMR as a communication tool. Future research is needed to better understand how to enhance patient?doctor- EMR communication. This research should correlate observed physician behavior to patient satisfaction, focus on physician communication skills training, and explore inpatient experiences. Electronic supplementary material: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11606-015-3582-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Twit Text FOAVip Impact of Electronic Medical Record Use on the Patient Doctor Relationship and Communication: A Systematic Review ????J Gen Intern Med http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26786877 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26786877 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|26786877}}</ref> Impact of Electronic Medical Record Use on the Patient?Doctor Relationship and Communication: A Systematic Review #MMPMID26786877 Alkureishi MA; Lee WW; Lyons M; Press VG; Imam S; Nkansah-Amankra A; Werner D; Arora VM J Gen Intern Med 2016[May]; 31 (5): 548-60 PMID26786877show ga BACKGROUND: While Electronic Medical Record (EMR) use has increased dramatically, the EMR?s impact on the patient?doctor relationship remains unclear. This systematic literature review sought to understand the impact of EMR use on patient?doctor relationships and communication. METHODS: Parallel searches in Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, reference review of prior systematic reviews, meeting abstract reviews, and expert reviews from August 2013 to March 2015 were conducted. Medical Subject Heading terms related to EMR use were combined with keyword terms identifying face-to-face patient?doctor communication. English language observational or interventional studies (1995?2015) were included. Studies examining physician attitudes only were excluded. Structured data extraction compared study population, design, data collection method, and outcomes. RESULTS: Fifty-three of 7445 studies reviewed met inclusion criteria. Included studies used behavioral analysis (28) to objectively measure communication behaviors using video or direct observation and pre-post or cross-sectional surveys to examine patient perceptions (25). Objective studies reported EMR communication behaviors that were both potentially negative (i.e., interrupted speech, low rates of screen sharing) and positive (i.e., facilitating questions). Studies examining overall patient perceptions of satisfaction, communication or the patient?doctor relationship (n?=?22) reported no change with EMR use (16); a positive impact (5) or showed mixed results (1). Study quality was not assessable. Small sample sizes limited generalizability. Publication bias may limit findings. DISCUSSION: Despite objective evidence that EMR use may negatively impact patient?doctor communication, studies examining patient perceptions found no change in patient satisfaction or patient?doctor communication. Therefore, our findings should encourage providers to adopt the EMR as a communication tool. Future research is needed to better understand how to enhance patient?doctor- EMR communication. This research should correlate observed physician behavior to patient satisfaction, focus on physician communication skills training, and explore inpatient experiences. Electronic supplementary material: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11606-015-3582-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. äImpact of Electronic Medical Record Use on the Patient?Doctor Relation(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing