Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1111/cdev.12263 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1111/cdev.12263 C4807134!4807134!24990627     free     free     free Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=24990627&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215       Child+Dev 2014 ; 85 (5): 1795-804 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=24990627|t=2014. The Goldilocks Effect in Infant Auditory Attention |pdf=|usr=}}{{24990627}} gab.com Text The Goldilocks Effect in Infant Auditory Attention JO: Child Dev http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=24990627 #FOAvip Infants must learn about many cognitive domains (e.g., language, music) from auditory statistics, yet capacity-limited cognitive resources restrict the quantity that they can encode. While we know infants can attend to only a subset of available acoustic input, few previous studies have directly examined infant auditory attention?and none have directly tested theorized mechanisms of attentional selection based on stimulus complexity. Using model-based behavioral methods that were recently developed to examine visual attention in infants (e.g., Kidd, Piantadosi, & Aslin, 2012), we demonstrate that 7- to 8-month-old infants selectively attend to non-social auditory stimuli that are intermediately predictable/complex with respect to their current implicit beliefs and expectations. Our results provide evidence of a broad principle of infant attention across modalities and suggest that sound-to-sound transitional statistics heavily influence the allocation of auditory attention in human infants. Twit Text FOAVip The Goldilocks Effect in Infant Auditory Attention ????Child Dev http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=24990627 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=24990627 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|24990627}}</ref> The Goldilocks Effect in Infant Auditory Attention #MMPMID24990627 Kidd C; Piantadosi ST; Aslin RN Child Dev 2014[Sep]; 85 (5): 1795-804 PMID24990627show ga Infants must learn about many cognitive domains (e.g., language, music) from auditory statistics, yet capacity-limited cognitive resources restrict the quantity that they can encode. While we know infants can attend to only a subset of available acoustic input, few previous studies have directly examined infant auditory attention?and none have directly tested theorized mechanisms of attentional selection based on stimulus complexity. Using model-based behavioral methods that were recently developed to examine visual attention in infants (e.g., Kidd, Piantadosi, & Aslin, 2012), we demonstrate that 7- to 8-month-old infants selectively attend to non-social auditory stimuli that are intermediately predictable/complex with respect to their current implicit beliefs and expectations. Our results provide evidence of a broad principle of infant attention across modalities and suggest that sound-to-sound transitional statistics heavily influence the allocation of auditory attention in human infants. äThe Goldilocks Effect in Infant Auditory Attention (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing