Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010509 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010509 C4785321!4785321!26956164     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       BMJ+Open 2016 ; 6 (3): ä Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=26956164|t=2016. Tweeting links to Cochrane Schizophrenia Group reviews: a randomised controlled trial |pdf=|usr=}}{{26956164}} gab.com Text Tweeting links to Cochrane Schizophrenia Group reviews: a randomised controlled trial JO: BMJ Open http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26956164 #FOAvip Objective: To assess the effects of using health social media on web activity. Design: Individually randomised controlled parallel group superiority trial. Setting: Twitter and Weibo. Participants: 170 Cochrane Schizophrenia Group full reviews with an abstract and plain language summary web page. Interventions: Three randomly ordered slightly different 140 character or less messages, each containing a short URL to the freely accessible summary page sent on specific times on one single day. This was compared with no messaging. Outcome: The primary outcome was web page visits at 1?week. Secondary outcomes were other metrics of web activity at 1?week. Results: 85 reviews were randomised to each of the intervention and control arms. Google Analytics allowed 100% follow-up within 1?week of completion. Intervention and control reviews received a total of 1162 and 449 visits, respectively (IRR 2.7, 95% CI 2.2 to 3.3). Fewer intervention reviews had single page only visits (16% vs 31%, OR 0.41, 0.19 to 0.88) and users spent more time viewing intervention reviews (geometric mean 76 vs 31?s, ratio 2.5, 1.3 to 4.6). Other secondary metrics of web activity all showed strong evidence in favour of the intervention. Conclusions: Tweeting in this limited area of healthcare increases ?product placement? of evidence with the potential for that to influence care. Trial registration number: ISRCTN84658943. Twit Text FOAVip Tweeting links to Cochrane Schizophrenia Group reviews: a randomised controlled trial ????BMJ Open http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26956164 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26956164 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|26956164}}</ref> Tweeting links to Cochrane Schizophrenia Group reviews: a randomised controlled trial #MMPMID26956164 Adams CE; Jayaram M; Bodart AYM; Sampson S; Zhao S; Montgomery AA BMJ Open 2016[]; 6 (3): ä PMID26956164show ga Objective: To assess the effects of using health social media on web activity. Design: Individually randomised controlled parallel group superiority trial. Setting: Twitter and Weibo. Participants: 170 Cochrane Schizophrenia Group full reviews with an abstract and plain language summary web page. Interventions: Three randomly ordered slightly different 140 character or less messages, each containing a short URL to the freely accessible summary page sent on specific times on one single day. This was compared with no messaging. Outcome: The primary outcome was web page visits at 1?week. Secondary outcomes were other metrics of web activity at 1?week. Results: 85 reviews were randomised to each of the intervention and control arms. Google Analytics allowed 100% follow-up within 1?week of completion. Intervention and control reviews received a total of 1162 and 449 visits, respectively (IRR 2.7, 95% CI 2.2 to 3.3). Fewer intervention reviews had single page only visits (16% vs 31%, OR 0.41, 0.19 to 0.88) and users spent more time viewing intervention reviews (geometric mean 76 vs 31?s, ratio 2.5, 1.3 to 4.6). Other secondary metrics of web activity all showed strong evidence in favour of the intervention. Conclusions: Tweeting in this limited area of healthcare increases ?product placement? of evidence with the potential for that to influence care. Trial registration number: ISRCTN84658943. äTweeting links to Cochrane Schizophrenia Group reviews: a randomised c(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing