Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1177/1740774515614542

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1177/1740774515614542
suck pdf from google scholar
C4785046!4785046!26572562
unlimited free pdf from europmc26572562    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid26572562      Clin+Trials 2016 ; 13 (2): 188-98
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Sample Size Under the Additive Hazards Model #MMPMID26572562
  • McDaniel LS; Yu M; Chappell R
  • Clin Trials 2016[Apr]; 13 (2): 188-98 PMID26572562show ga
  • Background: The additive hazards model can be easier to interpret and in some cases fits better than the proportional hazards model. However, sample size formulas for clinical trials with time to event outcomes are currently based on either the proportional hazards assumption or an assumption of constant hazards. Aims: The goal is to provide sample size formulas for superiority and non-inferiority trials assuming an additive hazards model but no specific distribution, along with evaluations of the performance of the formulas. Methods: Formulas are presented that determine the required sample size for a given scenario under the additive hazards model. Simulations are conducted to ensure that the formulas attain the desired power. For illustration, the non-inferiority sample size formula is applied to the calculations in the SPORTIF III trial of stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Conclusions: Simulation results show that the sample size calculations lead to the correct power. Sample size is easily calculated using a tool that is available on the web at http://leemcdaniel.github.io/samplesize.html.
  • ä


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box