Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1371/journal.pone.0149504 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1371/journal.pone.0149504 C4784736!4784736!26960191     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       PLoS+One 2016 ; 11 (3): ä Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=26960191|t=2016. Researchers? Individual Publication Rate Has Not Increased in a Century |pdf=|usr=}}{{26960191}} gab.com Text Researchers Individual Publication Rate Has Not Increased in a Century JO: PLoS One http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26960191 #FOAvip Debates over the pros and cons of a ?publish or perish? philosophy have inflamed academia for at least half a century. Growing concerns, in particular, are expressed for policies that reward ?quantity? at the expense of ?quality,? because these might prompt scientists to unduly multiply their publications by fractioning (?salami slicing?), duplicating, rushing, simplifying, or even fabricating their results. To assess the reasonableness of these concerns, we analyzed publication patterns of over 40,000 researchers that, between the years 1900 and 2013, have published two or more papers within 15 years, in any of the disciplines covered by the Web of Science. The total number of papers published by researchers during their early career period (first fifteen years) has increased in recent decades, but so has their average number of co-authors. If we take the latter factor into account, by measuring productivity fractionally or by only counting papers published as first author, we observe no increase in productivity throughout the century. Even after the 1980s, adjusted productivity has not increased for most disciplines and countries. These results are robust to methodological choices and are actually conservative with respect to the hypothesis that publication rates are growing. Therefore, the widespread belief that pressures to publish are causing the scientific literature to be flooded with salami-sliced, trivial, incomplete, duplicated, plagiarized and false results is likely to be incorrect or at least exaggerated. Twit Text FOAVip Researchers Individual Publication Rate Has Not Increased in a Century ????PLoS One http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26960191 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26960191 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|26960191}}</ref> Researchers? Individual Publication Rate Has Not Increased in a Century #MMPMID26960191 Fanelli D; Larivière V PLoS One 2016[]; 11 (3): ä PMID26960191show ga Debates over the pros and cons of a ?publish or perish? philosophy have inflamed academia for at least half a century. Growing concerns, in particular, are expressed for policies that reward ?quantity? at the expense of ?quality,? because these might prompt scientists to unduly multiply their publications by fractioning (?salami slicing?), duplicating, rushing, simplifying, or even fabricating their results. To assess the reasonableness of these concerns, we analyzed publication patterns of over 40,000 researchers that, between the years 1900 and 2013, have published two or more papers within 15 years, in any of the disciplines covered by the Web of Science. The total number of papers published by researchers during their early career period (first fifteen years) has increased in recent decades, but so has their average number of co-authors. If we take the latter factor into account, by measuring productivity fractionally or by only counting papers published as first author, we observe no increase in productivity throughout the century. Even after the 1980s, adjusted productivity has not increased for most disciplines and countries. These results are robust to methodological choices and are actually conservative with respect to the hypothesis that publication rates are growing. Therefore, the widespread belief that pressures to publish are causing the scientific literature to be flooded with salami-sliced, trivial, incomplete, duplicated, plagiarized and false results is likely to be incorrect or at least exaggerated. äResearchers? Individual Publication Rate Has Not Increased in a Centur(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing