Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.4103/1008-682X.171582 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.4103/1008-682X.171582 C4770502!4770502!26806079     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Asian+J+Androl 2016 ; 18 (2): 296-309 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=26806079|t=2016. Bibliometrics: tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics |pdf=|usr=}}{{26806079}} gab.com Text Bibliometrics: tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics JO: Asian J Androl http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26806079 #FOAvip Traditionally, the success of a researcher is assessed by the number of publications he or she publishes in peer-reviewed, indexed, high impact journals. This essential yardstick, often referred to as the impact of a specific researcher, is assessed through the use of various metrics. While researchers may be acquainted with such matrices, many do not know how to use them to enhance their careers. In addition to these metrics, a number of other factors should be taken into consideration to objectively evaluate a scientist's profile as a researcher and academician. Moreover, each metric has its own limitations that need to be considered when selecting an appropriate metric for evaluation. This paper provides a broad overview of the wide array of metrics currently in use in academia and research. Popular metrics are discussed and defined, including traditional metrics and article-level metrics, some of which are applied to researchers for a greater understanding of a particular concept, including varicocele that is the thematic area of this Special Issue of Asian Journal of Andrology. We recommend the combined use of quantitative and qualitative evaluation using judiciously selected metrics for a more objective assessment of scholarly output and research impact. Twit Text FOAVip Bibliometrics: tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics ????Asian J Androl http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26806079 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26806079 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|26806079}}</ref> Bibliometrics: tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics #MMPMID26806079 Agarwal A; Durairajanayagam D; Tatagari S; Esteves SC; Harlev A; Henkel R; Roychoudhury S; Homa S; Puchalt NG; Ramasamy R; Majzoub A; Ly KD; Tvrda E; Assidi M; Kesari K; Sharma R; Banihani S; Ko E; Abu-Elmagd M; Gosalvez J; Bashiri A Asian J Androl 2016[Mar]; 18 (2): 296-309 PMID26806079show ga Traditionally, the success of a researcher is assessed by the number of publications he or she publishes in peer-reviewed, indexed, high impact journals. This essential yardstick, often referred to as the impact of a specific researcher, is assessed through the use of various metrics. While researchers may be acquainted with such matrices, many do not know how to use them to enhance their careers. In addition to these metrics, a number of other factors should be taken into consideration to objectively evaluate a scientist's profile as a researcher and academician. Moreover, each metric has its own limitations that need to be considered when selecting an appropriate metric for evaluation. This paper provides a broad overview of the wide array of metrics currently in use in academia and research. Popular metrics are discussed and defined, including traditional metrics and article-level metrics, some of which are applied to researchers for a greater understanding of a particular concept, including varicocele that is the thematic area of this Special Issue of Asian Journal of Andrology. We recommend the combined use of quantitative and qualitative evaluation using judiciously selected metrics for a more objective assessment of scholarly output and research impact. äBibliometrics: tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate m(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing