Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1016/j.aju.2015.11.005 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.aju.2015.11.005 C4767792!4767792!26966588     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Arab+J+Urol 2016 ; 14 (1): 18-23 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=26966588|t=2016. Standard versus tubeless mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A randomised controlled trial |pdf=|usr=}}{{26966588}} gab.com Text Standard versus tubeless mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A randomised controlled trial JO: Arab J Urol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26966588 #FOAvip Objective: To prospectively compare the outcome of standard mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SmPCNL) versus tubeless mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (TmPCNL) as primary treatments of renal stones. Patients and methods: In all, 80 patients with a solitary radio-opaque renal stone and candidates for PCNL were selected. The patients were randomly divided into two groups of 40, one group treated with SmPCNL and the other with TmPCNL. Patients and stone characters, as well as operative and postoperative data of both groups were compared and statistically analysed. Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups for patient demographics and stone characteristics. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups for the mean operative time, mean postoperative drop in haemoglobin, mean postoperative urine leakage, mean hospital stay, and stone-free rate. The mean (SD) postoperative dose of analgesia was statistically significantly higher in the SmPCNL group compared with the TmPCNL group, at 112.5 (48.03) versus 48.8 (43.5) mg, respectively. Conclusion: Both procedures are safe and effective for managing renal stones, without any significant difference between the two procedures; however, the postoperative analgesic requirement is significantly higher in SmPCNL. Twit Text FOAVip Standard versus tubeless mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A randomised controlled trial ????Arab J Urol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26966588 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26966588 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|26966588}}</ref> Standard versus tubeless mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A randomised controlled trial #MMPMID26966588 Sebaey A; Khalil MM; Soliman T; Mohey A; Elshaer W; Kandil W; Omar R Arab J Urol 2016[Mar]; 14 (1): 18-23 PMID26966588show ga Objective: To prospectively compare the outcome of standard mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SmPCNL) versus tubeless mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (TmPCNL) as primary treatments of renal stones. Patients and methods: In all, 80 patients with a solitary radio-opaque renal stone and candidates for PCNL were selected. The patients were randomly divided into two groups of 40, one group treated with SmPCNL and the other with TmPCNL. Patients and stone characters, as well as operative and postoperative data of both groups were compared and statistically analysed. Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups for patient demographics and stone characteristics. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups for the mean operative time, mean postoperative drop in haemoglobin, mean postoperative urine leakage, mean hospital stay, and stone-free rate. The mean (SD) postoperative dose of analgesia was statistically significantly higher in the SmPCNL group compared with the TmPCNL group, at 112.5 (48.03) versus 48.8 (43.5) mg, respectively. Conclusion: Both procedures are safe and effective for managing renal stones, without any significant difference between the two procedures; however, the postoperative analgesic requirement is significantly higher in SmPCNL. äStandard versus tubeless mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A randomis(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing