Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.18240/ijo.2016.02.22 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.18240/ijo.2016.02.22 C4761746!4761746!26949654     free     free     free Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=26949654&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 215.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 215.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 215.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 215.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 215.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 215.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Int+J+Ophthalmol 2016 ; 9 (2): 292-7 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=26949654|t=2016. Comparison of two types of visual quality analyzer for the measurement of high order aberrations |pdf=|usr=}}{{26949654}} gab.com Text Comparison of two types of visual quality analyzer for the measurement of high order aberrations JO: Int J Ophthalmol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26949654 #FOAvip AIM: To compare the difference and agreement of KR-1W and iTrace for measurement of high order aberrations. METHODS: KR-1W and iTrace were respectively used in a group of healthy people (40 volunteers, 32 eyes) to measure the high order aberration (HOA) of corneal, internal and total ocular. The clinical difference and agreement of two instruments were respectively evaluated by paired-samples t-test and Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: The paired-samples t-test showed that the corneal HOA measured by the two instruments had no statistical differences (P>0.05); but the internal and total ocular HOA had significant statistical differences (P<0.05), and the mean results measured by iTrace were higher than that of KR-1W. However, Bland-Altman analysis revealed that the HOA of corneal and internal were all in 95% limits of agreement; and just one point of total ocular HOA was beyond the 95% limits of agreement. CONCLUSION: KR-1W and iTrace were consistent well in the measurement of corneal, internal and total ocular HOA, especially for the cornea. Twit Text FOAVip Comparison of two types of visual quality analyzer for the measurement of high order aberrations ????Int J Ophthalmol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26949654 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26949654 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|26949654}}</ref> Comparison of two types of visual quality analyzer for the measurement of high order aberrations #MMPMID26949654 Hao J; Li L; Tian F; Zhang H Int J Ophthalmol 2016[]; 9 (2): 292-7 PMID26949654show ga AIM: To compare the difference and agreement of KR-1W and iTrace for measurement of high order aberrations. METHODS: KR-1W and iTrace were respectively used in a group of healthy people (40 volunteers, 32 eyes) to measure the high order aberration (HOA) of corneal, internal and total ocular. The clinical difference and agreement of two instruments were respectively evaluated by paired-samples t-test and Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: The paired-samples t-test showed that the corneal HOA measured by the two instruments had no statistical differences (P>0.05); but the internal and total ocular HOA had significant statistical differences (P<0.05), and the mean results measured by iTrace were higher than that of KR-1W. However, Bland-Altman analysis revealed that the HOA of corneal and internal were all in 95% limits of agreement; and just one point of total ocular HOA was beyond the 95% limits of agreement. CONCLUSION: KR-1W and iTrace were consistent well in the measurement of corneal, internal and total ocular HOA, especially for the cornea. äComparison of two types of visual quality analyzer for the measurement(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing