Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1098/rsnr.2015.0021 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1098/rsnr.2015.0021 C4759716!4759716!27017681     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Notes+Rec+R+Soc+Lond 2016 ; 70 (1): 83-100 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=27017681|t=2016. The logic of scientific unity? Medawar, the Royal Society and the Rothschild controversy 1971?72 |pdf=|usr=}}{{27017681}} gab.com Text The logic of scientific unity Medawar, the Royal Society and the Rothschild controversy 1971 72 JO: Notes Rec R Soc Lond http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27017681 #FOAvip In 1971 Lord (Victor) Rothschild published his report for the government, The organisation and management of government R&D, and Sir Peter Medawar launched a campaign for the election of Sir Karl Popper to Fellowship of the Royal Society. We explore these two developments in the contexts of the then current views of the role and purpose of science, and their underpinning philosophy. Although the political battle was won by Rothschild, resulting in major changes to the funding and management of applied R&D, we argue that, despite this, Medawar's campaign for Popper provided an embattled science community with a philosophical basis for defending pure research and the unity of basic and applied science. Twit Text FOAVip The logic of scientific unity Medawar, the Royal Society and the Rothschild controversy 1971 72 ????Notes Rec R Soc Lond http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27017681 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27017681 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|27017681}}</ref> The logic of scientific unity? Medawar, the Royal Society and the Rothschild controversy 1971?72 #MMPMID27017681 Calver N; Parker M Notes Rec R Soc Lond 2016[Mar]; 70 (1): 83-100 PMID27017681show ga In 1971 Lord (Victor) Rothschild published his report for the government, The organisation and management of government R&D, and Sir Peter Medawar launched a campaign for the election of Sir Karl Popper to Fellowship of the Royal Society. We explore these two developments in the contexts of the then current views of the role and purpose of science, and their underpinning philosophy. Although the political battle was won by Rothschild, resulting in major changes to the funding and management of applied R&D, we argue that, despite this, Medawar's campaign for Popper provided an embattled science community with a philosophical basis for defending pure research and the unity of basic and applied science. äThe logic of scientific unity? Medawar, the Royal Society and the Roth(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing