Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1111/imm.12558 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1111/imm.12558 C4754613!4754613!26790994     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Immunology 2016 ; 147 (3): 269-74 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=26790994|t=2016. The curious case of the 1960 Nobel Prize to Burnet and Medawar |pdf=|usr=}}{{26790994}} gab.com Text The curious case of the 1960 Nobel Prize to Burnet and Medawar JO: Immunology http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26790994 #FOAvip The 1960 Nobel Prize was awarded to Macfarlane Burnet and Peter Medawar for immunological tolerance. The Nobel Archives reveal that the two were never nominated together by anyone; Burnet had repeatedly been nominated for his virology studies, and the Medawar group (including Rupert Billingham and Leslie Brent) had been nominated independently for their transplantation work. A review of the 1950s literature suggests that tolerance had not yet, by 1960, reached the level of acceptance and acclaim in the immunological community to appear to justify the award. Burnet probably should have received the Prize for his virus work, and perhaps also for his Clonal Selection Theory, whereas Billingham and Brent should have shared in a Prize with Medawar for transplantation. If a Prize were to be given for tolerance, most agree that Ray Owen should have shared in it, for his work on cattle chimerism. It is suggested that the 1960 Nobel Prize to Burnet and Medawar for immunological tolerance may have been given for the wrong reasons and to the wrong associates. Twit Text FOAVip The curious case of the 1960 Nobel Prize to Burnet and Medawar ????Immunology http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26790994 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26790994 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|26790994}}</ref> The curious case of the 1960 Nobel Prize to Burnet and Medawar #MMPMID26790994 Silverstein AM Immunology 2016[Mar]; 147 (3): 269-74 PMID26790994show ga The 1960 Nobel Prize was awarded to Macfarlane Burnet and Peter Medawar for immunological tolerance. The Nobel Archives reveal that the two were never nominated together by anyone; Burnet had repeatedly been nominated for his virology studies, and the Medawar group (including Rupert Billingham and Leslie Brent) had been nominated independently for their transplantation work. A review of the 1950s literature suggests that tolerance had not yet, by 1960, reached the level of acceptance and acclaim in the immunological community to appear to justify the award. Burnet probably should have received the Prize for his virus work, and perhaps also for his Clonal Selection Theory, whereas Billingham and Brent should have shared in a Prize with Medawar for transplantation. If a Prize were to be given for tolerance, most agree that Ray Owen should have shared in it, for his work on cattle chimerism. It is suggested that the 1960 Nobel Prize to Burnet and Medawar for immunological tolerance may have been given for the wrong reasons and to the wrong associates. äThe curious case of the 1960 Nobel Prize to Burnet and Medawar (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing