Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=26701758
&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215
Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 247.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 247.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 247.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 247.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 247.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 247.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 247.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 280.79999999999995 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 280.79999999999995 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
Warning: imagejpeg(C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\phplern\26701758
.jpg): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 117 PLoS+One
2015 ; 10
(12
): e0145294
Nephropedia Template TP
gab.com Text
Twit Text FOAVip
Twit Text #
English Wikipedia
Media Coverage, Journal Press Releases and Editorials Associated with Randomized
and Observational Studies in High-Impact Medical Journals: A Cohort Study
#MMPMID26701758
Wang MT
; Bolland MJ
; Gamble G
; Grey A
PLoS One
2015[]; 10
(12
): e0145294
PMID26701758
show ga
BACKGROUND: Publication of clinical research findings in prominent journals
influences health beliefs and medical practice, in part by engendering news
coverage. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) should be most influential in
guiding clinical practice. We determined whether study design of clinical
research published in high-impact journals influences media coverage. METHODS AND
FINDINGS: We compared the incidence and amount of media coverage of RCTs with
that of observational studies published in the top 7 medical journals between 1
January 2013 and 31 March 2013. We specifically assessed media coverage of the
most rigorous RCTs, those with >1000 participants that reported 'hard' outcomes.
There was no difference between RCTs and observational studies in coverage by
major newspapers or news agencies, or in total number of news stories generated
(all P>0.63). Large RCTs reporting 'hard' outcomes did not generate more news
coverage than small RCTs that reported surrogate outcomes and observational
studies (all P>0.32). RCTs were more likely than observational studies to attract
a journal editorial (70% vs 46%, P = 0.003), but less likely to be the subject of
a journal press release (17% vs 50%, P<0.001). Large RCTs that reported 'hard'
outcomes did not attract an editorial more frequently than other studies (61% vs
58%, P>0.99), nor were they more likely to be the subject of a journal press
release (14% vs 38%, P = 0.14). CONCLUSIONS: The design of clinical studies whose
results are published in high-impact medical journals is not associated with the
likelihood or amount of ensuing news coverage.