Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1073/pnas.1518127112 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1073/pnas.1518127112 C4687580!4687580!26621703     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Proc+Natl+Acad+Sci+U+S+A 2015 ; 112 (50): 15402-7 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=26621703|t=2015. Genomic data do not support comb jellies as the sister group to all other animals |pdf=|usr=}}{{26621703}} gab.com Text Genomic data do not support comb jellies as the sister group to all other animals JO: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26621703 #FOAvip Clarifying the phylogeny of animals is fundamental to understanding their evolution. Traditionally, sponges have been considered the sister group of all other extant animals, but recent genomic studies have suggested comb jellies occupy that position instead. Here, we analyzed the current genomic evidence from comb jellies and found no convincing support for this hypothesis. Instead, when analyzed with appropriate methods, recent genomic data support the traditional hypothesis. We conclude that the alternative scenario of animal evolution according to which ctenophores evolved morphological complexity independently from cnidarians and bilaterians or, alternatively, sponges secondarily lost a nervous system, muscles, and other characters, is not supported by the available evidence. Twit Text FOAVip Genomic data do not support comb jellies as the sister group to all other animals ????Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26621703 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26621703 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|26621703}}</ref> Genomic data do not support comb jellies as the sister group to all other animals #MMPMID26621703 Pisani D; Pett W; Dohrmann M; Feuda R; Rota-Stabelli O; Philippe H; Lartillot N; Wörheide G Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015[Dec]; 112 (50): 15402-7 PMID26621703show ga Clarifying the phylogeny of animals is fundamental to understanding their evolution. Traditionally, sponges have been considered the sister group of all other extant animals, but recent genomic studies have suggested comb jellies occupy that position instead. Here, we analyzed the current genomic evidence from comb jellies and found no convincing support for this hypothesis. Instead, when analyzed with appropriate methods, recent genomic data support the traditional hypothesis. We conclude that the alternative scenario of animal evolution according to which ctenophores evolved morphological complexity independently from cnidarians and bilaterians or, alternatively, sponges secondarily lost a nervous system, muscles, and other characters, is not supported by the available evidence. äGenomic data do not support comb jellies as the sister group to all ot(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing