Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1002/ajim.22323 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1002/ajim.22323 C4671486!4671486!24700499     free     free     free Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=24700499&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215       Am+J+Ind+Med 2014 ; 57 (9): 1001-10 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=24700499|t=2014. Do Hearing Protectors Protect Hearing?|pdf=|usr=}}{{24700499}} gab.com Text Do Hearing Protectors Protect Hearing JO: Am J Ind Med http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=24700499 #FOAvip Background: We examined the association between self-reported hearing protection use at work and incidence of hearing shifts over a 5-year period. Methods: Audiometric data from 19,911 workers were analyzed. Two hearing shift measures?OSHA standard threshold shift (OSTS) and high-frequency threshold shift (HFTS)?were used to identify incident shifts in hearing between workers? 2005 and 2009 audiograms. Adjusted odds ratios were generated using multivariable logistic regression with multi-level modeling. Results: The odds ratio for hearing shift for workers who reported never versus always wearing hearing protection was nonsignificant for OSTS (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.92?1.64) and marginally significant for HFTS (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.00?1.59). A significant linear trend towards increased risk of HFTS with decreased use of hearing protection was observed (P = 0.02). Conclusion: The study raises concern about the effectiveness of hearing protection as a substitute for noise control to prevent noise-induced hearing loss in the workplace. Am. J. Ind. Med. 57:1001?1010, 2014. Published 2014. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Twit Text FOAVip Do Hearing Protectors Protect Hearing ????Am J Ind Med http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=24700499 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=24700499 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|24700499}}</ref> Do Hearing Protectors Protect Hearing? #MMPMID24700499 Groenewold MR; Masterson EA; Themann CL; Davis RR Am J Ind Med 2014[Sep]; 57 (9): 1001-10 PMID24700499show ga Background: We examined the association between self-reported hearing protection use at work and incidence of hearing shifts over a 5-year period. Methods: Audiometric data from 19,911 workers were analyzed. Two hearing shift measures?OSHA standard threshold shift (OSTS) and high-frequency threshold shift (HFTS)?were used to identify incident shifts in hearing between workers? 2005 and 2009 audiograms. Adjusted odds ratios were generated using multivariable logistic regression with multi-level modeling. Results: The odds ratio for hearing shift for workers who reported never versus always wearing hearing protection was nonsignificant for OSTS (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.92?1.64) and marginally significant for HFTS (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.00?1.59). A significant linear trend towards increased risk of HFTS with decreased use of hearing protection was observed (P = 0.02). Conclusion: The study raises concern about the effectiveness of hearing protection as a substitute for noise control to prevent noise-induced hearing loss in the workplace. Am. J. Ind. Med. 57:1001?1010, 2014. Published 2014. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. äDo Hearing Protectors Protect Hearing?(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing