Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.5489/cuaj.3028

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.5489/cuaj.3028
suck pdf from google scholar
C4662445!4662445!26664507
unlimited free pdf from europmc26664507    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid26664507      Can+Urol+Assoc+J 2015 ; 9 (9-10): E723-6
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • A modified surgical procedure for concealed penis #MMPMID26664507
  • Cheng G; Liu B; Guan Z; Huang Y; Qin C; Song N; Wang Z
  • Can Urol Assoc J 2015[Sep]; 9 (9-10): E723-6 PMID26664507show ga
  • Introduction:: We described a modified surgical procedure for repairing a concealed penis and compared the efficacy and feasibility of modified repair with traditional repair. Methods:: From March 2003 to December 2012, 96 patients with a concealed penis were recruited to undergo penile repair at our centre. Modified repair and traditional repair were performed respectively on 46 and 50 cases. We compared operative time, intraoperative blood loss, cosmetic result of operative scars, postoperative penile retraction, and complications. Results:: All operations were completed successfully without serious complications. The mean operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and cosmetic result of the operative scar between the two surgical methods were similar. However, the postoperative penile retraction rate in patients undergoing modified repair decreased significantly than in the traditional repair. Conclusions:: Our modified surgical procedure is effective and feasible for a concealed penis. Although extra procedures were needed for the modified repair, the operative time, intraoperative blood loss and cosmetic result of operative scar between the two procedures were similar. Compared with traditional repair, modified repair has better clinical outcomes.
  • ä


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box