Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.4070/kcj.2015.45.6.451 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.4070/kcj.2015.45.6.451 C4661359!4661359!26617646     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 227.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 227.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 227.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 227.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 227.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Korean+Circ+J 2015 ; 45 (6): 451-6 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=26617646|t=2015. Radiation Exposure in Coronary Angiography: A Comparison of Cineangiography and Fluorography |pdf=|usr=}}{{26617646}} gab.com Text Radiation Exposure in Coronary Angiography: A Comparison of Cineangiography and Fluorography JO: Korean Circ J http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26617646 #FOAvip Background and Objectives: Coronary angiography (CAG) is the gold standard for diagnosing coronary artery disease. However, exposure to ionizing radiation delivered during CAG has various negative biological effects on humans. In this study, there was an evaluation of whether fluorography resulted in decreased radiation exposure, as compared with cineangiography. Subjects and Methods: Fifty-five patients were prospectively enrolled and divided into two CAG groups, in accordance with the operator's professional discretion: a conventional cineangiography group versus a fluorography group. Fluorography refers to the photography of fluoroscopic images that are retrospectively stored, e.g., using the "Store fluoro" function of the Siemens cardiac angiography system. The primary outcomes included the air kinetic energy released per unit mass {air kerma (AK) mGy} and the dose (kerma)-area product (DAP; µGy · m2), both measured using built-in software in the Siemens system. The secondary outcomes included the total procedure time and amount of contrast agent used with each CAG method. Results: The total AK and DAP were significantly lower in the fluorography group (159.3±64.9 mGy and 1337.9±629.6 µGy · m2, respectively) than in the cineangiography group (326.9±107.5 mGy and 2341.1±849.9 µGy · m2, respectively; p=0.000 for both). The total procedure time (cineangiography vs. fluorography, 12.8±4.7 vs. 12.5±2.9 min; p=0.779) and contrast agent amount (136.1±28.3 vs. 126.3±25.7, p=0.214) were comparable between the two groups. Conclusion: Fluorography is a useful method to decrease the radiation exposure in selected patients requiring CAG. Twit Text FOAVip Radiation Exposure in Coronary Angiography: A Comparison of Cineangiography and Fluorography ????Korean Circ J http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26617646 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26617646 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|26617646}}</ref> Radiation Exposure in Coronary Angiography: A Comparison of Cineangiography and Fluorography #MMPMID26617646 Hwang J; Lee SY; Chon MK; Lee SH; Hwang KW; Kim JS; Park YH; Kim JH; Chun KJ Korean Circ J 2015[Nov]; 45 (6): 451-6 PMID26617646show ga Background and Objectives: Coronary angiography (CAG) is the gold standard for diagnosing coronary artery disease. However, exposure to ionizing radiation delivered during CAG has various negative biological effects on humans. In this study, there was an evaluation of whether fluorography resulted in decreased radiation exposure, as compared with cineangiography. Subjects and Methods: Fifty-five patients were prospectively enrolled and divided into two CAG groups, in accordance with the operator's professional discretion: a conventional cineangiography group versus a fluorography group. Fluorography refers to the photography of fluoroscopic images that are retrospectively stored, e.g., using the "Store fluoro" function of the Siemens cardiac angiography system. The primary outcomes included the air kinetic energy released per unit mass {air kerma (AK) mGy} and the dose (kerma)-area product (DAP; µGy · m2), both measured using built-in software in the Siemens system. The secondary outcomes included the total procedure time and amount of contrast agent used with each CAG method. Results: The total AK and DAP were significantly lower in the fluorography group (159.3±64.9 mGy and 1337.9±629.6 µGy · m2, respectively) than in the cineangiography group (326.9±107.5 mGy and 2341.1±849.9 µGy · m2, respectively; p=0.000 for both). The total procedure time (cineangiography vs. fluorography, 12.8±4.7 vs. 12.5±2.9 min; p=0.779) and contrast agent amount (136.1±28.3 vs. 126.3±25.7, p=0.214) were comparable between the two groups. Conclusion: Fluorography is a useful method to decrease the radiation exposure in selected patients requiring CAG. äRadiation Exposure in Coronary Angiography: A Comparison of Cineangiog(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing