Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1073/pnas.1502280112 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1073/pnas.1502280112 C4653214!4653214!26504239     free     free     free       Proc+Natl+Acad+Sci+U+S+A 2015 ; 112 (45): 13823-6 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=26504239|t=2015. The incidence and role of negative citations in science |pdf=|usr=}}{{26504239}} gab.com Text The incidence and role of negative citations in science JO: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26504239 #FOAvip Providing a detailed classification of the types of citations that an article receives is important to establish the quality of a study and to characterize how current research builds upon prior work. The methodology that we propose also informs how to improve the citation process, for example by having scientists attach additional metadata to their citations. The approach is scalable to other fields and periods and can also be used to identify other types of citations (e.g., reuse of methods, materials, empirical tests of theory, and so on). Finally, our methods provide online repositories such as Google Scholar, PubMed, ISI Web of Science, and Scopus with a way to improve their search and ranking algorithms. Twit Text FOAVip The incidence and role of negative citations in science ????Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26504239 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26504239 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|26504239}}</ref> The incidence and role of negative citations in science #MMPMID26504239 Catalini C; Lacetera N; Oettl A Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015[Nov]; 112 (45): 13823-6 PMID26504239show ga Providing a detailed classification of the types of citations that an article receives is important to establish the quality of a study and to characterize how current research builds upon prior work. The methodology that we propose also informs how to improve the citation process, for example by having scientists attach additional metadata to their citations. The approach is scalable to other fields and periods and can also be used to identify other types of citations (e.g., reuse of methods, materials, empirical tests of theory, and so on). Finally, our methods provide online repositories such as Google Scholar, PubMed, ISI Web of Science, and Scopus with a way to improve their search and ranking algorithms. äThe incidence and role of negative citations in science (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing