Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/ C4642922/?report=reader!4642922!26889506     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Can+Fam+Physician 2015 ; 61 (11): e509-16 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=26889506|t=2015. Reasons for delays in diagnosis of anal cancer and the effect on patient satisfaction |pdf=|usr=}}{{26889506}} gab.com Text Reasons for delays in diagnosis of anal cancer and the effect on patient satisfaction JO: Can Fam Physician http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26889506 #FOAvip Objective: To quantify the time to diagnosis of anal cancer after onset of symptoms, to identify reasons for delays in diagnosis, and to identify the effect of delays on patient satisfaction. Design: Retrospective questionnaire. Setting: Cross Cancer Institute in Edmonton, Alta. Participants: Patients newly diagnosed with anal cancer on their first visit to the centre. Main outcome measures: Timeline from first symptoms to first access to medical care and to diagnosis, and patient satisfaction. Results: Twenty-six patients completed the survey. Although most sought medical attention promptly, 19% waited for more than 6 months. At first visits after symptom onset, a rectal examination was performed in only 54% of patients, a diagnosis of hemorrhoids was given in 27% of patients, and further investigations were ordered in only 54% of patients. If a misdiagnosis of hemorrhoids was made, substantially more visits were required to diagnose the cancer. An average of 3.2 months after the first visit to a physician and 7.4 months after onset of symptoms was needed to obtain a diagnosis. Overall, 28% of patients believed there were no diagnostic delays and 40% of patients thought they were responsible for the delay. Overall, 72% of patients were satisfied with the care they received. Patients who were dissatisfied perceived the delay in diagnosis to be because no action was taken by a physician or the wait was too long for tests or referrals. Conclusion: To reduce delays in diagnosis, it might be important to educate relevant populations about symptoms of anal cancer. In addition, primary care physicians must maintain a high index of suspicion of anal cancer in high-risk populations. Finally, there must be a system-wide increase in access to further investigations through gastroenterologists and general surgeons. Twit Text FOAVip Reasons for delays in diagnosis of anal cancer and the effect on patient satisfaction ????Can Fam Physician http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26889506 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26889506 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|26889506}}</ref> Reasons for delays in diagnosis of anal cancer and the effect on patient satisfaction #MMPMID26889506 Chiu S; Joseph K; Ghosh S; Cornand RM; Schiller D Can Fam Physician 2015[Nov]; 61 (11): e509-16 PMID26889506show ga Objective: To quantify the time to diagnosis of anal cancer after onset of symptoms, to identify reasons for delays in diagnosis, and to identify the effect of delays on patient satisfaction. Design: Retrospective questionnaire. Setting: Cross Cancer Institute in Edmonton, Alta. Participants: Patients newly diagnosed with anal cancer on their first visit to the centre. Main outcome measures: Timeline from first symptoms to first access to medical care and to diagnosis, and patient satisfaction. Results: Twenty-six patients completed the survey. Although most sought medical attention promptly, 19% waited for more than 6 months. At first visits after symptom onset, a rectal examination was performed in only 54% of patients, a diagnosis of hemorrhoids was given in 27% of patients, and further investigations were ordered in only 54% of patients. If a misdiagnosis of hemorrhoids was made, substantially more visits were required to diagnose the cancer. An average of 3.2 months after the first visit to a physician and 7.4 months after onset of symptoms was needed to obtain a diagnosis. Overall, 28% of patients believed there were no diagnostic delays and 40% of patients thought they were responsible for the delay. Overall, 72% of patients were satisfied with the care they received. Patients who were dissatisfied perceived the delay in diagnosis to be because no action was taken by a physician or the wait was too long for tests or referrals. Conclusion: To reduce delays in diagnosis, it might be important to educate relevant populations about symptoms of anal cancer. In addition, primary care physicians must maintain a high index of suspicion of anal cancer in high-risk populations. Finally, there must be a system-wide increase in access to further investigations through gastroenterologists and general surgeons. äReasons for delays in diagnosis of anal cancer and the effect on patie(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing