Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1007/s13280-015-0714-0 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1007/s13280-015-0714-0 C4623858!4623858!26508350     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Ambio 2015 ; 44 (Suppl 4): 636-47 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=26508350|t=2015. The social implications of using drones for biodiversity conservation |pdf=|usr=}}{{26508350}} gab.com Text The social implications of using drones for biodiversity conservation JO: Ambio http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26508350 #FOAvip Unmanned aerial vehicles, or ?drones?, appear to offer a flexible, accurate and affordable solution to some of the technical challenges of nature conservation monitoring and law enforcement. However, little attention has been given to their possible social impacts. In this paper, I review the possible social impacts of using drones for conservation, including on safety, privacy, psychological wellbeing, data security and the wider understanding of conservation problems. I argue that negative social impacts are probable under some circumstances and should be of concern for conservation for two reasons: (1) because conservation should follow good ethical practice; and (2) because negative social impacts could undermine conservation effectiveness in the long term. The paper concludes with a call for empirical research to establish whether the identified social risks of drones occur in reality and how they could be mitigated, and for self-regulation of drone use by the conservation sector to ensure good ethical practice and minimise the risk of unintended consequences. Twit Text FOAVip The social implications of using drones for biodiversity conservation ????Ambio http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26508350 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26508350 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|26508350}}</ref> The social implications of using drones for biodiversity conservation #MMPMID26508350 Sandbrook C Ambio 2015[Nov]; 44 (Suppl 4): 636-47 PMID26508350show ga Unmanned aerial vehicles, or ?drones?, appear to offer a flexible, accurate and affordable solution to some of the technical challenges of nature conservation monitoring and law enforcement. However, little attention has been given to their possible social impacts. In this paper, I review the possible social impacts of using drones for conservation, including on safety, privacy, psychological wellbeing, data security and the wider understanding of conservation problems. I argue that negative social impacts are probable under some circumstances and should be of concern for conservation for two reasons: (1) because conservation should follow good ethical practice; and (2) because negative social impacts could undermine conservation effectiveness in the long term. The paper concludes with a call for empirical research to establish whether the identified social risks of drones occur in reality and how they could be mitigated, and for self-regulation of drone use by the conservation sector to ensure good ethical practice and minimise the risk of unintended consequences. äThe social implications of using drones for biodiversity conservation (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing