Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1038/srep15635 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1038/srep15635 C4621518!4621518!26503429     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 245.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 245.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 245.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Warning: imagejpeg(C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\phplern\26503429.jpg): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 117       Sci+Rep 2015 ; 5 (ä): ä Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=26503429|t=2015. Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |pdf=|usr=}}{{26503429}} gab.com Text Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials JO: Sci Rep http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26503429 #FOAvip Recent evidence regarding mechanical chest compressions in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is conflicting. The objective of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the effect of mechanical versus manual chest compressions on resuscitation outcomes in OHCA. PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the ClinicalTrials.gov registry were searched. In total, five RCTs with 12,510 participants were included. Compared with manual chest compressions, mechanical chest compressions did not significantly improve survival with good neurological outcome to hospital discharge (relative risks (RR) 0.80, 95% CI 0.61?1.04, P?=?0.10; I2?=?65%), return of spontaneous circulation (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.95?1.09, P?=?0.59; I2?=?0%), or long-term (?6 months) survival (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.79?1.16, P?=?0.65; I2?=?16%). In addition, mechanical chest compressions were associated with worse survival to hospital admission (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.89?1.00, P?=?0.04; I2?=?0%) and to hospital discharge (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.78?0.99, P?=?0.03; I2?=?0%). Based on the current evidence, widespread use of mechanical devices for chest compressions in OHCA cannot be recommended. Twit Text FOAVip Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials ????Sci Rep http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26503429 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26503429 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|26503429}}</ref> Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials #MMPMID26503429 Tang L; Gu WJ; Wang F Sci Rep 2015[]; 5 (ä): ä PMID26503429show ga Recent evidence regarding mechanical chest compressions in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is conflicting. The objective of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the effect of mechanical versus manual chest compressions on resuscitation outcomes in OHCA. PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the ClinicalTrials.gov registry were searched. In total, five RCTs with 12,510 participants were included. Compared with manual chest compressions, mechanical chest compressions did not significantly improve survival with good neurological outcome to hospital discharge (relative risks (RR) 0.80, 95% CI 0.61?1.04, P?=?0.10; I2?=?65%), return of spontaneous circulation (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.95?1.09, P?=?0.59; I2?=?0%), or long-term (?6 months) survival (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.79?1.16, P?=?0.65; I2?=?16%). In addition, mechanical chest compressions were associated with worse survival to hospital admission (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.89?1.00, P?=?0.04; I2?=?0%) and to hospital discharge (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.78?0.99, P?=?0.03; I2?=?0%). Based on the current evidence, widespread use of mechanical devices for chest compressions in OHCA cannot be recommended. äMechanical versus manual chest compressions for out-of-hospital cardia(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing