Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.7508/iej.2015.04.011 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.7508/iej.2015.04.011 C4609666!4609666 !26525955     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 245.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 245.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Warning: imagejpeg(C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\phplern\26525955 .jpg): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 117       Iran+Endod+J 2015 ; 10 (4 ): 263-7 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=26525955 |t=2015. Comparing the Coronal Flaring Efficacy of Five Different Instruments Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography |pdf=|usr=}}{{26525955 }} gab.com Text Comparing the Coronal Flaring Efficacy of Five Different Instruments Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography JO: Iran Endod J http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26525955 #FOAvip INTRODUCTION: Fearless removal of tooth structure during canal preparation and shaping has negative effects on the prognosis of treatment. On the other hand, sufficient pre-enlargement facilitates exact measurement of the apical size. The present in vitro study aimed to compare the efficacy of Gates-Glidden drills, K3, ProTaper, FlexMaster and RaCe instruments in dentin removal during coronal flaring using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 40 mandibular molars were selected and the coronal areas of their mesiobuccal and mesiolingual root canals were randomly prepared with either mentioned instruments. Pre- and post-instrumentation CBCT images were taken and the thickness of canal walls was measured in 1.5- and 3-mm distances from the furcation area. Data were analyzed using the one-way ANOVA. Tukey's post hoc tests were used for two-by-two comparisons. RESULTS: At 1.5-mm distance, there was no significant difference between different instruments. However, at 3-mm distances, Gates-Glidden drills removed significantly more dentin compared to FlexMaster files (mean=0.18 mm) (P<0.02); however, two-by-two comparisons did not reveal any significant differences between the other groups. CONCLUSION: All tested instruments can be effectively used in clinical settings for coronal pre-enlargement. Twit Text FOAVip Comparing the Coronal Flaring Efficacy of Five Different Instruments Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography ????Iran Endod J http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26525955 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26525955 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|26525955 }}</ref> Comparing the Coronal Flaring Efficacy of Five Different Instruments Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography #MMPMID26525955 Homayoon A ; Hamidi MR ; Haddadi A ; Madani ZS ; Moudi E ; Bijani A Iran Endod J 2015[Fal]; 10 (4 ): 263-7 PMID26525955 show ga INTRODUCTION: Fearless removal of tooth structure during canal preparation and shaping has negative effects on the prognosis of treatment. On the other hand, sufficient pre-enlargement facilitates exact measurement of the apical size. The present in vitro study aimed to compare the efficacy of Gates-Glidden drills, K3, ProTaper, FlexMaster and RaCe instruments in dentin removal during coronal flaring using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 40 mandibular molars were selected and the coronal areas of their mesiobuccal and mesiolingual root canals were randomly prepared with either mentioned instruments. Pre- and post-instrumentation CBCT images were taken and the thickness of canal walls was measured in 1.5- and 3-mm distances from the furcation area. Data were analyzed using the one-way ANOVA. Tukey's post hoc tests were used for two-by-two comparisons. RESULTS: At 1.5-mm distance, there was no significant difference between different instruments. However, at 3-mm distances, Gates-Glidden drills removed significantly more dentin compared to FlexMaster files (mean=0.18 mm) (P<0.02); however, two-by-two comparisons did not reveal any significant differences between the other groups. CONCLUSION: All tested instruments can be effectively used in clinical settings for coronal pre-enlargement. äComparing the Coronal Flaring Efficacy of Five Different Instruments U(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing