Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1097/MD.0000000000000621 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1097/MD.0000000000000621 C4602498!4602498 !25881835     free     free     free Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=25881835 &cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 247.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 247.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 247.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Warning: imagejpeg(C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\phplern\25881835 .jpg): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 117       Medicine+(Baltimore) 2015 ; 94 (15 ): e621 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=25881835 |t=2015. What is the most accurate method for the treatment of diminutive colonic polyps?: Standard versus jumbo forceps polypectomy |pdf=|usr=}}{{25881835 }} gab.com Text What is the most accurate method for the treatment of diminutive colonic polyps : Standard versus jumbo forceps polypectomy JO: Medicine (Baltimore) http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=25881835 #FOAvip Different methods such as standard, hot, and jumbo forceps are used in endoscopic treatment of diminutive colon polyps. In the current study, it was aimed to compare efficacy and safety of standard and jumbo forceps polypectomy methods in treatment of diminutive colon polyps of ?5?mm. Polyps with ?5 mm which were excised during colonoscopy by using standard or jumbo forceps were evaluated. Standard and jumbo forceps polypectomy methods were randomly performed in 212 consecutive patients with diminutive colorectal polyp. One-bite polypectomy and complete resection rates were also determined among polypectomy methods. Results of 161 standard forceps polypectomy and 102 jumbo forceps polypectomy were retrospectively evaluated. Both one-bite polypectomy and complete resection rates were significantly higher in the jumbo forceps polypectomy group than the standard forceps polypectomy group (P?<?0.001). In the subgroup analysis performed according to polyp sizes, complete resection rate among polyps with 3-mm diameter was determined as 100%. However, numbers of bites in 4-mm and 5-mm polyps were higher in the standard forceps polypectomy group, and complete resection rate was lower than in the jumbo forceps polypectomy group (P?<?0.001). Both endoscopic treatment methods may be employed in treatment of diminutive colon polyps with ?5?mm. However, jumbo forceps polypectomy is a more effective treatment method in 4- to 5-mm polyps with high one-bite polypectomy and complete resection rate. Twit Text FOAVip What is the most accurate method for the treatment of diminutive colonic polyps : Standard versus jumbo forceps polypectomy ????Medicine (Baltimore) http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=25881835 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=25881835 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|25881835 }}</ref> What is the most accurate method for the treatment of diminutive colonic polyps?: Standard versus jumbo forceps polypectomy #MMPMID25881835 Aslan F ; Cekiç C ; Camci M ; Alper E ; Ekinci N ; Akpinar Z ; Alpek S ; Arabul M ; Unsal B Medicine (Baltimore) 2015[Apr]; 94 (15 ): e621 PMID25881835 show ga Different methods such as standard, hot, and jumbo forceps are used in endoscopic treatment of diminutive colon polyps. In the current study, it was aimed to compare efficacy and safety of standard and jumbo forceps polypectomy methods in treatment of diminutive colon polyps of ?5?mm. Polyps with ?5 mm which were excised during colonoscopy by using standard or jumbo forceps were evaluated. Standard and jumbo forceps polypectomy methods were randomly performed in 212 consecutive patients with diminutive colorectal polyp. One-bite polypectomy and complete resection rates were also determined among polypectomy methods. Results of 161 standard forceps polypectomy and 102 jumbo forceps polypectomy were retrospectively evaluated. Both one-bite polypectomy and complete resection rates were significantly higher in the jumbo forceps polypectomy group than the standard forceps polypectomy group (P? |Adult [MESH] |Aged [MESH] |Colonic Polyps/*surgery [MESH] |Digestive System Surgical Procedures/adverse effects/*instrumentation/methods [MESH] |Female [MESH] |Humans [MESH] |Male [MESH] |Middle Aged [MESH] |Retrospective Studies [MESH]What is the most accurate method for the treatment of diminutive colon(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing