Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1186/s12916-015-0492-3 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1186/s12916-015-0492-3 C4587677!4587677!26416788     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 219.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 219.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       BMC+Med 2015 ; 13 (ä): ä Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=26416788|t=2015. Better prioritization to increase research value and decrease waste |pdf=|usr=}}{{26416788}} gab.com Text Better prioritization to increase research value and decrease waste JO: BMC Med http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26416788 #FOAvip In a recent study published in BMC Medicine, Singh Ospina and colleagues outlined the important gaps between ongoing research and research needs in the field of endocrinology. Many recommendations from clinical practice guidelines are based on a low level of evidence, thereby resulting in research gaps. Despite the publication of around 25,000 randomized controlled trials each year, ongoing research does not cover most of these gaps. In contrast, trials are planned when sufficient data are already available for decision making, which results in redundant research and exposes patients to unnecessary risks. This lack of prioritization contributes to the enormous problem of waste in research. A systematic approach to accumulate the available body of evidence is necessary to determine when we have sufficient evidence and when we have knowledge gaps, defined as research questions with no or a low level of evidence available. Systematic registration of research gaps and their prioritization may help to organize future research. Some initiatives exist, but they need to be generalized.Please see related research: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/13/187 Twit Text FOAVip Better prioritization to increase research value and decrease waste ????BMC Med http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26416788 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26416788 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|26416788}}</ref> Better prioritization to increase research value and decrease waste #MMPMID26416788 Dechartres A; Ravaud P BMC Med 2015[]; 13 (ä): ä PMID26416788show ga In a recent study published in BMC Medicine, Singh Ospina and colleagues outlined the important gaps between ongoing research and research needs in the field of endocrinology. Many recommendations from clinical practice guidelines are based on a low level of evidence, thereby resulting in research gaps. Despite the publication of around 25,000 randomized controlled trials each year, ongoing research does not cover most of these gaps. In contrast, trials are planned when sufficient data are already available for decision making, which results in redundant research and exposes patients to unnecessary risks. This lack of prioritization contributes to the enormous problem of waste in research. A systematic approach to accumulate the available body of evidence is necessary to determine when we have sufficient evidence and when we have knowledge gaps, defined as research questions with no or a low level of evidence available. Systematic registration of research gaps and their prioritization may help to organize future research. Some initiatives exist, but they need to be generalized.Please see related research: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/13/187 äBetter prioritization to increase research value and decrease waste (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing