Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1155/2015/902534 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1155/2015/902534 C4564798!4564798 !26413553     free     free     free       Biomed+Res+Int 2015 ; 2015 (?): 902534 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=26413553 |t=2015. Reexamination of Statistical Methods for Comparative Anatomy: Examples of Its Application and Comparisons with Other Parametric and Nonparametric Statistics |pdf=|usr=}}{{26413553 }} gab.com Text Reexamination of Statistical Methods for Comparative Anatomy: Examples of Its Application and Comparisons with Other Parametric and Nonparametric Statistics JO: Biomed Res Int http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26413553 #FOAvip Various statistical methods have been published for comparative anatomy. However, few studies compared parametric and nonparametric statistical methods. Moreover, some previous studies using statistical method for comparative anatomy (SMCA) proposed the formula for comparison of groups of anatomical structures (multiple structures) among different species. The present paper described the usage of SMCA and compared the results by SMCA with those by parametric test (t-test) and nonparametric analyses (cladistics) of anatomical data. In conclusion, the SMCA can offer a more exact and precise way to compare single and multiple anatomical structures across different species, which requires analyses of nominal features in comparative anatomy. Twit Text FOAVip Reexamination of Statistical Methods for Comparative Anatomy: Examples of Its Application and Comparisons with Other Parametric and Nonparametric Statistics ????Biomed Res Int http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26413553 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26413553 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|26413553 }}</ref> Reexamination of Statistical Methods for Comparative Anatomy: Examples of Its Application and Comparisons with Other Parametric and Nonparametric Statistics #MMPMID26413553 Aversi-Ferreira RA ; Nishijo H ; Aversi-Ferreira TA Biomed Res Int 2015[]; 2015 (?): 902534 PMID26413553 show ga Various statistical methods have been published for comparative anatomy. However, few studies compared parametric and nonparametric statistical methods. Moreover, some previous studies using statistical method for comparative anatomy (SMCA) proposed the formula for comparison of groups of anatomical structures (multiple structures) among different species. The present paper described the usage of SMCA and compared the results by SMCA with those by parametric test (t-test) and nonparametric analyses (cladistics) of anatomical data. In conclusion, the SMCA can offer a more exact and precise way to compare single and multiple anatomical structures across different species, which requires analyses of nominal features in comparative anatomy. |*Models, Statistical [MESH] |Anatomy, Comparative/*methods [MESH] |Animals [MESH] |Humans [MESH] |Primates [MESH]Reexamination of Statistical Methods for Comparative Anatomy: Examples(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing