Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1093/gbe/evv152 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1093/gbe/evv152 C4558868!4558868!26253318     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Genome+Biol+Evol 2015 ; 7 (8): 2445-57 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=26253318|t=2015. Multilevel Selection Theory and the Evolutionary Functions of Transposable Elements |pdf=|usr=}}{{26253318}} gab.com Text Multilevel Selection Theory and the Evolutionary Functions of Transposable Elements JO: Genome Biol Evol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26253318 #FOAvip One of several issues at play in the renewed debate over ?junk DNA? is the organizational level at which genomic features might be seen as selected, and thus to exhibit function, as etiologically defined. The intuition frequently expressed by molecular geneticists that junk DNA is functional because it serves to ?speed evolution? or as an ?evolutionary repository? could be recast as a claim about selection between species (or clades) rather than within them, but this is not often done. Here, we review general arguments for the importance of selection at levels above that of organisms in evolution, and develop them further for a common genomic feature: the carriage of transposable elements (TEs). In many species, not least our own, TEs comprise a large fraction of all nuclear DNA, and whether they individually or collectively contribute to fitness?or are instead junk? is a subject of ongoing contestation. Even if TEs generally owe their origin to selfish selection at the lowest level (that of genomes), their prevalence in extant organisms and the prevalence of extant organisms bearing them must also respond to selection within species (on organismal fitness) and between species (on rates of speciation and extinction). At an even higher level, the persistence of clades may be affected (positively or negatively) by TE carriage. If indeed TEs speed evolution, it is at these higher levels of selection that such a function might best be attributed to them as a class. Twit Text FOAVip Multilevel Selection Theory and the Evolutionary Functions of Transposable Elements ????Genome Biol Evol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26253318 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26253318 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|26253318}}</ref> Multilevel Selection Theory and the Evolutionary Functions of Transposable Elements #MMPMID26253318 Brunet TD; Doolittle WF Genome Biol Evol 2015[Aug]; 7 (8): 2445-57 PMID26253318show ga One of several issues at play in the renewed debate over ?junk DNA? is the organizational level at which genomic features might be seen as selected, and thus to exhibit function, as etiologically defined. The intuition frequently expressed by molecular geneticists that junk DNA is functional because it serves to ?speed evolution? or as an ?evolutionary repository? could be recast as a claim about selection between species (or clades) rather than within them, but this is not often done. Here, we review general arguments for the importance of selection at levels above that of organisms in evolution, and develop them further for a common genomic feature: the carriage of transposable elements (TEs). In many species, not least our own, TEs comprise a large fraction of all nuclear DNA, and whether they individually or collectively contribute to fitness?or are instead junk? is a subject of ongoing contestation. Even if TEs generally owe their origin to selfish selection at the lowest level (that of genomes), their prevalence in extant organisms and the prevalence of extant organisms bearing them must also respond to selection within species (on organismal fitness) and between species (on rates of speciation and extinction). At an even higher level, the persistence of clades may be affected (positively or negatively) by TE carriage. If indeed TEs speed evolution, it is at these higher levels of selection that such a function might best be attributed to them as a class. äMultilevel Selection Theory and the Evolutionary Functions of Transpos(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing