Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1007/s13752-015-0218-y http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1007/s13752-015-0218-y C4551538!4551538!26339220     free     free     free       Biol+Theory 2015 ; 10 (3): 273-80 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=26339220|t=2015. On Quantity and Quality in Human Knowledge |pdf=|usr=}}{{26339220}} gab.com Text On Quantity and Quality in Human Knowledge JO: Biol Theory http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26339220 #FOAvip Any discipline of human knowledge is characterized by three fundamental elements: the complexity of its content, the method used for its elaboration, and the language used for its expression. This article argues that any method for making knowledge is a particular combination of three main components that we can call (a) science, (b) art, and (c) revelation. The right combination depends on the complexity of the slice of reality that we wish to understand in each case. Is there a relationship between the quantity and quality of a particular piece of knowledge and the quantity and quality of its eventual audience? Such a relationship serves, I believe, to avoid certain old misunderstandings. Twit Text FOAVip On Quantity and Quality in Human Knowledge ????Biol Theory http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26339220 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26339220 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|26339220}}</ref> On Quantity and Quality in Human Knowledge #MMPMID26339220 Wagensberg J Biol Theory 2015[]; 10 (3): 273-80 PMID26339220show ga Any discipline of human knowledge is characterized by three fundamental elements: the complexity of its content, the method used for its elaboration, and the language used for its expression. This article argues that any method for making knowledge is a particular combination of three main components that we can call (a) science, (b) art, and (c) revelation. The right combination depends on the complexity of the slice of reality that we wish to understand in each case. Is there a relationship between the quantity and quality of a particular piece of knowledge and the quantity and quality of its eventual audience? Such a relationship serves, I believe, to avoid certain old misunderstandings. äOn Quantity and Quality in Human Knowledge (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing