Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.2176/nmc.ra.2014-0361 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.2176/nmc.ra.2014-0361 C4533336!4533336!25739437     free     free     free       Neurol+Med+Chir+(Tokyo) 2015 ; 55 (3): 230-40 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=25739437|t=2015. Evidence for Management of Carotid Artery Stenosis |pdf=|usr=}}{{25739437}} gab.com Text Evidence for Management of Carotid Artery Stenosis JO: Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=25739437 #FOAvip In this review, we presented the evidence concerning carotid artery stenosis treatment in symptomatic stenosis and asymptomatic stenosis separately, and discussed the future challenges. The validity of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) to treat moderate or greater degree of symptomatic carotid artery stenosis appears to be established. Due to the additional option of carotid artery stenting (CAS), it is necessary to comprehensively determine whether CEA or CAS is more appropriate for each individual patient. Moreover, since there are rapid advancements in devices for CAS and improvements in treatment outcomes, continual learning of the latest treatment method is essential. For asymptomatic stenosis, due to improvements in the outcomes with best medical treatment (BMT), it is essential to re-evaluate the use of invasive CEA/CAS. Continual verification of the latest randomized clinical trial that compares CEA, CAS, and BMT, and establishment of a diagnostic method that can accurately extract the group of patients who have the highest future risk of developing ischemia, are desired. Twit Text FOAVip Evidence for Management of Carotid Artery Stenosis ????Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=25739437 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=25739437 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|25739437}}</ref> Evidence for Management of Carotid Artery Stenosis #MMPMID25739437 YOSHIDA K; MIYAMOTO S Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2015[Mar]; 55 (3): 230-40 PMID25739437show ga In this review, we presented the evidence concerning carotid artery stenosis treatment in symptomatic stenosis and asymptomatic stenosis separately, and discussed the future challenges. The validity of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) to treat moderate or greater degree of symptomatic carotid artery stenosis appears to be established. Due to the additional option of carotid artery stenting (CAS), it is necessary to comprehensively determine whether CEA or CAS is more appropriate for each individual patient. Moreover, since there are rapid advancements in devices for CAS and improvements in treatment outcomes, continual learning of the latest treatment method is essential. For asymptomatic stenosis, due to improvements in the outcomes with best medical treatment (BMT), it is essential to re-evaluate the use of invasive CEA/CAS. Continual verification of the latest randomized clinical trial that compares CEA, CAS, and BMT, and establishment of a diagnostic method that can accurately extract the group of patients who have the highest future risk of developing ischemia, are desired. äEvidence for Management of Carotid Artery Stenosis (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing