Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1002/med.21348

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1002/med.21348
suck pdf from google scholar
C4529806!4529806!25850821
unlimited free pdf from europmc25850821    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid25850821      Med+Res+Rev 2015 ; 35 (5): 937-67
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Towards a Cancer Drug of Fungal Origin #MMPMID25850821
  • Kornienko A; Evidente A; Vurro M; Mathieu V; Cimmino A; Evidente M; van Otterlo WAL; Dasari R; Lefranc F; Kiss R
  • Med Res Rev 2015[Sep]; 35 (5): 937-67 PMID25850821show ga
  • Although fungi produce highly structurally diverse metabolites, many of which have served as excellent sources of pharmaceuticals, no fungi-derived agent has been approved as a cancer drug so far. This is despite a tremendous amount of research being aimed at the identification of fungal metabolites with promising anticancer activities. This review discusses the results of clinical testing of fungal metabolites and their synthetic derivatives, with the goal to evaluate how far we are from an approved cancer drug of fungal origin. Also, because in vivo studies in animal models are predictive of the efficacy and toxicity of a given compound in a clinical situation, literature describing animal cancer testing of compounds of fungal origin is reviewed as well. Agents showing the potential to advance to clinical trials are also identified. Finally, the technological challenges involved in the exploitation of fungal biodiversity and procurement of sufficient quantities of clinical candidates are discussed and potential solutions that could be pursued by researchers are highlighted.
  • ä


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box