Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1098/rsnr.2015.0029

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1098/rsnr.2015.0029
suck pdf from google scholar
C4528400!4528400!26495581
unlimited free pdf from europmc26495581    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid26495581      Notes+Rec+R+Soc+Lond 2015 ; 69 (3): 337-52
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Credibility, peer review, and Nature, 1945?1990 #MMPMID26495581
  • Baldwin M
  • Notes Rec R Soc Lond 2015[Sep]; 69 (3): 337-52 PMID26495581show ga
  • This paper examines the refereeing procedures at the scientific weekly Nature during and after World War II. In 1939 former editorial assistants L. J. F. Brimble and A. J. V. Gale assumed a joint editorship of Nature. The Brimble?Gale era is now most famous for the editors' unsystematic approach to external refereeing. Although Brimble and Gale did sometimes consult external referees, papers submitted or recommended by scientists whom the pair trusted were often not sent out for further review. Their successor, John Maddox, would also print papers he admired without external refereeing. It was not until 1973 that editor David Davies made external peer review a requirement for publication in Nature. Nature's example shows that as late as the 1960s a journal could be considered scientifically respectable even if its editors were known to eschew systematic external peer review.
  • ä


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box