Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.3978/j.issn.2227-684X.2015.05.01 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.3978/j.issn.2227-684X.2015.05.01 C4523626!4523626!26312212     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Gland+Surg 2015 ; 4 (4): 279-82 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=26312212|t=2015. Robot assisted adrenalectomy: a handy tool or glorified obsession?|pdf=|usr=}}{{26312212}} gab.com Text Robot assisted adrenalectomy: a handy tool or glorified obsession JO: Gland Surg http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26312212 #FOAvip Robotic surgery has recently expanded its horizon in urology apart from radical prostatectomy, one of them being adrenalectomy. Till now, laparoscopic adrenalectomy has established itself as the procedure of choice for benign adrenal disorders. Brandao et al. have recently accomplished a thorough systematic review and meta-analysis of nine trials comparing laparoscopic and robotic adrenalectomy. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of conversion rate [odds ratio (OR): 0.82; 95% CI, 0.39-1.75; P=0.61] and operative time (WMD: 5.88; 95% CI, ?6.02 to 17.79; P=0.33). There was a significantly longer hospital stay in the conventional laparoscopic group (WMD: ?0.43; 95% CI, ?0.56 to ?0.30; P<0.00001), as well as a higher estimated blood loss (WMD: ?18.21; 95% CI, ?29.11 to ?7.32; P=0.001). There was also no statistically significant difference in terms of postoperative complication rate. The authors seem to support the use of robot for adrenalectomy. However, robotic surgery suffers from cost issues and some technical drawbacks that limit its use in routine practice. Larger and appropriately powered randomized controlled trials are needed to establish and justify its use for performing adrenalectomy. Twit Text FOAVip Robot assisted adrenalectomy: a handy tool or glorified obsession ????Gland Surg http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26312212 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26312212 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|26312212}}</ref> Robot assisted adrenalectomy: a handy tool or glorified obsession? #MMPMID26312212 Pahwa M Gland Surg 2015[Aug]; 4 (4): 279-82 PMID26312212show ga Robotic surgery has recently expanded its horizon in urology apart from radical prostatectomy, one of them being adrenalectomy. Till now, laparoscopic adrenalectomy has established itself as the procedure of choice for benign adrenal disorders. Brandao et al. have recently accomplished a thorough systematic review and meta-analysis of nine trials comparing laparoscopic and robotic adrenalectomy. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of conversion rate [odds ratio (OR): 0.82; 95% CI, 0.39-1.75; P=0.61] and operative time (WMD: 5.88; 95% CI, ?6.02 to 17.79; P=0.33). There was a significantly longer hospital stay in the conventional laparoscopic group (WMD: ?0.43; 95% CI, ?0.56 to ?0.30; P<0.00001), as well as a higher estimated blood loss (WMD: ?18.21; 95% CI, ?29.11 to ?7.32; P=0.001). There was also no statistically significant difference in terms of postoperative complication rate. The authors seem to support the use of robot for adrenalectomy. However, robotic surgery suffers from cost issues and some technical drawbacks that limit its use in routine practice. Larger and appropriately powered randomized controlled trials are needed to establish and justify its use for performing adrenalectomy. äRobot assisted adrenalectomy: a handy tool or glorified obsession?(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing