Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/ C4515329!4515329!26221151     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 245.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 245.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 245.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 245.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 245.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 245.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 245.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 278.79999999999995 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Tanaffos 2015 ; 14 (1): 42-8 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=26221151|t=2015. Efficacy of the New Perilaryngeal Airway (CobraPLA?) Versus the Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA?) to Improve Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure in Obese and Overweight Patients |pdf=|usr=}}{{26221151}} gab.com Text Efficacy of the New Perilaryngeal Airway (CobraPLA ) Versus the Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA ) to Improve Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure in Obese and Overweight Patients JO: Tanaffos http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26221151 #FOAvip Background:: This study aimed to evaluate the applicability of Cobra perilaryngeal airway (Cobra PLA?) for obese patients under general anesthesia and also to compare the results with those of classic laryngeal mask airway (LMA?). Materials and Methods:: Seventy-three overweight and obese patients were included in this study. The patients were randomly assigned to LMA? or Cobra PLA? groups. Time required for intubation, successful intubation attempt, airway sealing pressure and incidence of complications including blood staining, sore throat and dysphagia were assessed and noted. Results:: Thirty-six and 37 patients were randomly allocated to LMA? and Cobra PLA? groups, respectively. Most patients were males and had Mallampati Class II airway in both groups. The first attempt and overall insertion success for Cobra PLA? was significantly higher compared to LMA (P<0.05). Airway insertion was more successful (P = 0.027; 94% vs. 77%) with Cobra PLA?. Insertion times were similar with Cobra PLA? and LMA? (Cobra PLA?, 29.94±16.35s; LMA?, 27.00±7.88s). The oropharyngeal leak pressure in the Cobra PLA? group (24.80±0.90 H2O) was significantly higher than that in LMA? group (19±1 H2O, p<0.001). Sore throat was more frequent in the LMA? group although it did not reach statistical significance (Fisher?s exact test, P = 0.33). Blood staining on airway tube was seen in both groups with a higher incidence in the Cobra PLA? group (Fisher?s Exact test, P = 0.02). Incidence of dysphagia was not different between the two groups. Conclusion:: CobraPLA? was found to be safe with low complications. It provided better airway sealing with high rate of the first insertion success for use in obese and overweight patients. This study recommends the use of CobraPLA? as a rescue device in emergency situations for obese and overweight patients. Twit Text FOAVip Efficacy of the New Perilaryngeal Airway (CobraPLA ) Versus the Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA ) to Improve Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure in Obese and Overweight Patients ????Tanaffos http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26221151 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26221151 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|26221151}}</ref> Efficacy of the New Perilaryngeal Airway (CobraPLA?) Versus the Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA?) to Improve Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure in Obese and Overweight Patients #MMPMID26221151 Yaghoobi S; Abootorabi SM; Kayalha H; Van Zundert TC; Pakpour AH Tanaffos 2015[]; 14 (1): 42-8 PMID26221151show ga Background:: This study aimed to evaluate the applicability of Cobra perilaryngeal airway (Cobra PLA?) for obese patients under general anesthesia and also to compare the results with those of classic laryngeal mask airway (LMA?). Materials and Methods:: Seventy-three overweight and obese patients were included in this study. The patients were randomly assigned to LMA? or Cobra PLA? groups. Time required for intubation, successful intubation attempt, airway sealing pressure and incidence of complications including blood staining, sore throat and dysphagia were assessed and noted. Results:: Thirty-six and 37 patients were randomly allocated to LMA? and Cobra PLA? groups, respectively. Most patients were males and had Mallampati Class II airway in both groups. The first attempt and overall insertion success for Cobra PLA? was significantly higher compared to LMA (P<0.05). Airway insertion was more successful (P = 0.027; 94% vs. 77%) with Cobra PLA?. Insertion times were similar with Cobra PLA? and LMA? (Cobra PLA?, 29.94±16.35s; LMA?, 27.00±7.88s). The oropharyngeal leak pressure in the Cobra PLA? group (24.80±0.90 H2O) was significantly higher than that in LMA? group (19±1 H2O, p<0.001). Sore throat was more frequent in the LMA? group although it did not reach statistical significance (Fisher?s exact test, P = 0.33). Blood staining on airway tube was seen in both groups with a higher incidence in the Cobra PLA? group (Fisher?s Exact test, P = 0.02). Incidence of dysphagia was not different between the two groups. Conclusion:: CobraPLA? was found to be safe with low complications. It provided better airway sealing with high rate of the first insertion success for use in obese and overweight patients. This study recommends the use of CobraPLA? as a rescue device in emergency situations for obese and overweight patients. äEfficacy of the New Perilaryngeal Airway (CobraPLA?) Versus the Laryng(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing