Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.3748/wjg.v21.i27.8441 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.3748/wjg.v21.i27.8441 C4507115!4507115!26217097     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       World+J+Gastroenterol 2015 ; 21 (27): 8441-51 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=26217097|t=2015. Outcomes of robotic vs laparoscopic hepatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis |pdf=|usr=}}{{26217097}} gab.com Text Outcomes of robotic vs laparoscopic hepatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis JO: World J Gastroenterol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26217097 #FOAvip AIM: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on robotic-assisted vs laparoscopic liver resections.METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Scopus and the Cochrane Library Central. Participants of any age and sex, who underwent robotic or laparoscopic liver resection were considered following these criteria: (1) studies comparing robotic and laparoscopic liver resection; (2) studies reporting at least one perioperative outcome; and (3) if more than one study was reported by the same institute, only the most recent was included. The primary outcome measures were set for estimated blood loss, operative time, conversion rate, R1 resection rate, morbidity and mortality rates, hospital stay and major hepatectomy rates.RESULTS: A total of 7 articles, published between 2010 and 2014, fulfilled the selection criteria. The laparoscopic approach was associated with a significant reduction in blood loss and lower operative time (MD = 83.96, 95%CI: 10.51-157.41, P = 0.03; MD = 68.43, 95%CI: 39.22-97.65, P < 0.00001, respectively). No differences were found with respect to conversion rate, R1 resection rate, morbidity and hospital stay.CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic liver resection resulted in reduced blood loss and shorter surgical times compared to robotic liver resections. There was no difference in conversion rate, R1 resection rate, morbidity and length of postoperative stay. Twit Text FOAVip Outcomes of robotic vs laparoscopic hepatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis ????World J Gastroenterol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26217097 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26217097 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|26217097}}</ref> Outcomes of robotic vs laparoscopic hepatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis #MMPMID26217097 Montalti R; Berardi G; Patriti A; Vivarelli M; Troisi RI World J Gastroenterol 2015[Jul]; 21 (27): 8441-51 PMID26217097show ga AIM: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on robotic-assisted vs laparoscopic liver resections.METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Scopus and the Cochrane Library Central. Participants of any age and sex, who underwent robotic or laparoscopic liver resection were considered following these criteria: (1) studies comparing robotic and laparoscopic liver resection; (2) studies reporting at least one perioperative outcome; and (3) if more than one study was reported by the same institute, only the most recent was included. The primary outcome measures were set for estimated blood loss, operative time, conversion rate, R1 resection rate, morbidity and mortality rates, hospital stay and major hepatectomy rates.RESULTS: A total of 7 articles, published between 2010 and 2014, fulfilled the selection criteria. The laparoscopic approach was associated with a significant reduction in blood loss and lower operative time (MD = 83.96, 95%CI: 10.51-157.41, P = 0.03; MD = 68.43, 95%CI: 39.22-97.65, P < 0.00001, respectively). No differences were found with respect to conversion rate, R1 resection rate, morbidity and hospital stay.CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic liver resection resulted in reduced blood loss and shorter surgical times compared to robotic liver resections. There was no difference in conversion rate, R1 resection rate, morbidity and length of postoperative stay. äOutcomes of robotic vs laparoscopic hepatectomy: A systematic review a(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing