Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.7171/jbt.15-2603-004 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.7171/jbt.15-2603-004 C4502656!4502656!26190945     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       J+Biomol+Tech 2015 ; 26 (3): 80-2 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=26190945|t=2015. How a Small Double-Stranded Trick Can Mislead Sanger Sequencing |pdf=|usr=}}{{26190945}} gab.com Text How a Small Double-Stranded Trick Can Mislead Sanger Sequencing JO: J Biomol Tech http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26190945 #FOAvip Notwithstanding the arrival of ?third-generation sequencing,? Sanger sequencing, developed in 1980, is still the most accurate and used method for sequencing, although on a smaller scale. It is a powerful resource for studying sequences and discovering polymorphisms and genes, as well as regulatory elements. There has already been described a wide range of possible problems with this very sensitive and accurate technology. Here, we show that a specific event, related to genomes rich in repetitive sequences, can mislead operators working with Sanger sequencing. Twit Text FOAVip How a Small Double-Stranded Trick Can Mislead Sanger Sequencing ????J Biomol Tech http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26190945 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26190945 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|26190945}}</ref> How a Small Double-Stranded Trick Can Mislead Sanger Sequencing #MMPMID26190945 Curci PL; Sonnante G J Biomol Tech 2015[Sep]; 26 (3): 80-2 PMID26190945show ga Notwithstanding the arrival of ?third-generation sequencing,? Sanger sequencing, developed in 1980, is still the most accurate and used method for sequencing, although on a smaller scale. It is a powerful resource for studying sequences and discovering polymorphisms and genes, as well as regulatory elements. There has already been described a wide range of possible problems with this very sensitive and accurate technology. Here, we show that a specific event, related to genomes rich in repetitive sequences, can mislead operators working with Sanger sequencing. äHow a Small Double-Stranded Trick Can Mislead Sanger Sequencing (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing