Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1186/s12863-015-0243-7

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1186/s12863-015-0243-7
suck pdf from google scholar
C4501077!4501077!26168789
unlimited free pdf from europmc26168789    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

suck abstract from ncbi


Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534

Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
pmid26168789      BMC+Genet 2015 ; 16 (ä): ä
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Fast imputation using medium or low-coverage sequence data #MMPMID26168789
  • VanRaden PM; Sun C; O?Connell JR
  • BMC Genet 2015[]; 16 (ä): ä PMID26168789show ga
  • Background: Accurate genotype imputation can greatly reduce costs and increase benefits by combining whole-genome sequence data of varying read depth and array genotypes of varying densities. For large populations, an efficient strategy chooses the two haplotypes most likely to form each genotype and updates posterior allele probabilities from prior probabilities within those two haplotypes as each individual?s sequence is processed. Directly using allele read counts can improve imputation accuracy and reduce computation compared with calling or computing genotype probabilities first and then imputing. Results: A new algorithm was implemented in findhap (version 4) software and tested using simulated bovine and actual human sequence data with different combinations of reference population size, sequence read depth and error rate. Read depths of ?8× may be desired for direct investigation of sequenced individuals, but for a given total cost, sequencing more individuals at read depths of 2× to 4× gave more accurate imputation from array genotypes. Imputation accuracy improved further if reference individuals had both low-coverage sequence and high-density (HD) microarray data, and remained high even with a read error rate of 16 %. With read depths of ?4×, findhap (version 4) had higher accuracy than Beagle (version 4); computing time was up to 400 times faster with findhap than with Beagle. For 10,000 sequenced individuals plus 250 with HD array genotypes to test imputation, findhap used 7 hours, 10 processors and 50 GB of memory for 1 million loci on one chromosome. Computing times increased in proportion to population size but less than proportional to number of variants. Conclusions: Simultaneous genotype calling from low-coverage sequence data and imputation from array genotypes of various densities is done very efficiently within findhap by updating allele probabilities within the two haplotypes for each individual. Accuracy of genotype calling and imputation were high with both simulated bovine and actual human genomes reduced to low-coverage sequence and HD microarray data. More efficient imputation allows geneticists to locate and test effects of more DNA variants from more individuals and to include those in future prediction and selection.
  • ä


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box