Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-052018 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-052018 C4492908!4492908!25564283     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Tob+Control 2016 ; 25 (2): 166-73 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=25564283|t=2016. Tobacco product prices before and after a statewide tobacco tax increase |pdf=|usr=}}{{25564283}} gab.com Text Tobacco product prices before and after a statewide tobacco tax increase JO: Tob Control http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=25564283 #FOAvip Background: In 2013, the State of Minnesota Legislature passed a tobacco tax increase that increased the combined cigarette excise and sales tax by $1.75 (from $1.60 to $3.35) and increased the tax on non-cigarette tobacco products from 70% to 95% of the wholesale price. The current study explores the change in tobacco prices in retail locations and whether the tax increase was fully passed to consumers. Methods: An observational study of tobacco retail prices was performed in a sample of 61 convenience stores in Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wisconsin. Six rounds of data were collected between May 2013 and January 2014. In each round, purchases were made at the same stores for the same four tobacco products (Camel Blue cigarettes, Marlboro Gold cigarettes, Grizzly Wintergreen moist smokeless tobacco, and Copenhagen Wintergreen moist smokeless tobacco). Results: For all studied tobacco products, prices in Minnesota increased significantly after the tax increase (Round 1?Round 6). After controlling for price changes in neighboring states, the average price difference in Minnesota for the two cigarette brands increased by $1.89 and $1.81, which are both more than the $1.75 tax increase. For moist smokeless, the average price difference increased by $0.90 and $0.94. Significant price changes were not observed in the comparison states. After the introduction of the minimum moist smokeless tax, a significantly higher proportion of Minnesota stores offered price promotions on smokeless tobacco. Conclusions: A large tobacco tax resulted in an average retail cigarette price exceeding the tax, suggesting the industry over-shifted the cigarette tax increase to consumers in Minnesota. The findings support the known public health benefit of tobacco tax increases while highlighting the need for additional information about how, or if, tobacco companies use price promotions to blunt the impact of tax increases. Twit Text FOAVip Tobacco product prices before and after a statewide tobacco tax increase ????Tob Control http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=25564283 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=25564283 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|25564283}}</ref> Tobacco product prices before and after a statewide tobacco tax increase #MMPMID25564283 Brock B; Choi K; Boyle RG; Moilanen M; Schillo BA Tob Control 2016[Mar]; 25 (2): 166-73 PMID25564283show ga Background: In 2013, the State of Minnesota Legislature passed a tobacco tax increase that increased the combined cigarette excise and sales tax by $1.75 (from $1.60 to $3.35) and increased the tax on non-cigarette tobacco products from 70% to 95% of the wholesale price. The current study explores the change in tobacco prices in retail locations and whether the tax increase was fully passed to consumers. Methods: An observational study of tobacco retail prices was performed in a sample of 61 convenience stores in Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wisconsin. Six rounds of data were collected between May 2013 and January 2014. In each round, purchases were made at the same stores for the same four tobacco products (Camel Blue cigarettes, Marlboro Gold cigarettes, Grizzly Wintergreen moist smokeless tobacco, and Copenhagen Wintergreen moist smokeless tobacco). Results: For all studied tobacco products, prices in Minnesota increased significantly after the tax increase (Round 1?Round 6). After controlling for price changes in neighboring states, the average price difference in Minnesota for the two cigarette brands increased by $1.89 and $1.81, which are both more than the $1.75 tax increase. For moist smokeless, the average price difference increased by $0.90 and $0.94. Significant price changes were not observed in the comparison states. After the introduction of the minimum moist smokeless tax, a significantly higher proportion of Minnesota stores offered price promotions on smokeless tobacco. Conclusions: A large tobacco tax resulted in an average retail cigarette price exceeding the tax, suggesting the industry over-shifted the cigarette tax increase to consumers in Minnesota. The findings support the known public health benefit of tobacco tax increases while highlighting the need for additional information about how, or if, tobacco companies use price promotions to blunt the impact of tax increases. äTobacco product prices before and after a statewide tobacco tax increa(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing