Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1038/srep11657 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1038/srep11657 C4479989!4479989!26108376     free     free     free Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=26108376&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215       Sci+Rep 2015 ; 5 (ä): ä Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=26108376|t=2015. The Missing Memristor has Not been Found |pdf=|usr=}}{{26108376}} gab.com Text The Missing Memristor has Not been Found JO: Sci Rep http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26108376 #FOAvip In 1971, not only the theoretical and by definition already existing ?ideal memristor? concept was introduced, but a real memristor device was suggested on grounds of the already known real inductors. The latter is a scientifically significant hypothesis grounded in fundamental symmetries of basic physics, here electro-magnetism. 2008 claimed the discovery of the ?missing memristor.? Controversy arose: The devices were not new, and the hypothesized device needs magnetism but has no material memory, while the available devices constitute analogue memory that would work in a world without magnetism. Nevertheless, even the originator of the prediction accepted the discovery. Defenders of the 2008 claim emphasize that the devices are not merely ?memristive systems,? which is however a distinction defined in 1976, not 1971. We clarify widely confused concepts and maintain that the originally hypothesized real memristor device is missing and likely impossible. The argument is illustrated also by finding an ideal mechanical memristor element and purely mechanical memristive systems, and hypothesizing a real mechanical memristor device that requires inert mass just like the 1971 implied device requires magnetic induction. Twit Text FOAVip The Missing Memristor has Not been Found ????Sci Rep http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26108376 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=26108376 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|26108376}}</ref> The Missing Memristor has Not been Found #MMPMID26108376 Vongehr S; Meng X Sci Rep 2015[]; 5 (ä): ä PMID26108376show ga In 1971, not only the theoretical and by definition already existing ?ideal memristor? concept was introduced, but a real memristor device was suggested on grounds of the already known real inductors. The latter is a scientifically significant hypothesis grounded in fundamental symmetries of basic physics, here electro-magnetism. 2008 claimed the discovery of the ?missing memristor.? Controversy arose: The devices were not new, and the hypothesized device needs magnetism but has no material memory, while the available devices constitute analogue memory that would work in a world without magnetism. Nevertheless, even the originator of the prediction accepted the discovery. Defenders of the 2008 claim emphasize that the devices are not merely ?memristive systems,? which is however a distinction defined in 1976, not 1971. We clarify widely confused concepts and maintain that the originally hypothesized real memristor device is missing and likely impossible. The argument is illustrated also by finding an ideal mechanical memristor element and purely mechanical memristive systems, and hypothesizing a real mechanical memristor device that requires inert mass just like the 1971 implied device requires magnetic induction. äThe Missing Memristor has Not been Found (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing